External Email - Use Caution
Thanks Douglas.
Is there a way to compute a weighted average in one command with fscalc ?
Best,
Matthieu
Le mar. 18 déc. 2018 à 18:03, Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. <
dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu> a écrit :
> you can use mri_vol2surf to sample at different
External Email - Use Caution
Hi Douglas,
Thanks for these clarifications. I have however one misunderstanding.
When sampling PVC corrected PET image onto surface:
- I use bbpet2anat.lta when MGX was used as specified un tutorial
- I use rbv2anat.lta when RBV was used
But why
External Email - Use Caution
Hi Douglas,
Thanks for helping.
To have an only rescaled voxel-wise PET image, these options seem to work
only when -rbv method is used and not -mgx.
Do you know why ?
Best,
Matthieu
Le mar. 18 déc. 2018 à 17:58, Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. <
External Email - Use Caution
Dear Drs. Winkler, Greve, Fischl, et al.
Could you help me understand which palm options are needed in order to
produce tfce and clustere NPC results that are fwe-corrected across
contrasts (i.e., _cfwep_)?
I'm analyzing area and thickness and have
No, not in the current framework. Even if there were, fwhm=.66 would not
give you much smoothing. The intervertex distance is about 1mm, at
fwhm=.66mm, the nearest vertex would be about 3 standard deviations
away, meaning that the smoothing would be minimal.
On 12/21/18 12:12 PM,
Hi Lindsay
it might be easiest to do what you want in matlab. We do supply m-files
for i/o of our various formats
cheers
Bruce
On Thu, 20 Dec 2018, lindsay hanford wrote:
External Email - Use Caution
Hello Freesurfer Community,
I am wondering if it is possible to
did you try to load it as a surface? If you want to upload the entire
subject dir (tarred and gzipped) to our ftp site we will take a look. In
the meantime you can also just post an image of the volume in 3 planes,
that might help
cheers
Bruce
On Fri, 21 Dec 2018, 허정선 wrote:
External
So, is there anyway around this issue?
>
> The smoothing works through iterative nearest neighbor smoothing, so the
> fwhm is essentially discretized because you can't have fractions of an
> iteration. It looks like fwhm=0.66 is closer to 0 iterations than 1
> iteration, so it chooses 0.
>
> On
The smoothing works through iterative nearest neighbor smoothing, so the
fwhm is essentially discretized because you can't have fractions of an
iteration. It looks like fwhm=0.66 is closer to 0 iterations than 1
iteration, so it chooses 0.
On 12/21/18 11:23 AM, sha...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
That’s odd – seems like somehow the file got corrupted. I suggest just
regenerating the brain.mgz by running:
mri_normalize -mprage -aseg aseg.presurf.mgz -mask brainmask.mgz norm.mgz
brain.mgz
from your subject’s mri directory. That should fix things.
best
Andrew
From: on behalf of Haoran
External Email - Use Caution
Apologies for the cross-posting and wide distribution.
Postdoc advertisement
==
The NMR Research Unit is a multidisciplinary research team focusing on
multiple sclerosis (MS). A Research Fellow is sought to work primarily on
the
Dear Surfers,
I am trying to use mris_fwhm to apply fwhm=0.66 to my fmri data (voxel
size 1 mm iso)using the below command:
mris_fwhm --s --hemi rh --smooth-only --i
fmcpr.sm0.self.projfrac_0.rh.nii.gz --fwhm 0.66 --o
fmcpr.sm0p66_surf.self.projfrac_0.rh.nii.gz --mask
External Email - Use Caution
Hi Freesurfer folks!
I am attempting to build freesurfer from source for our HPC center here at
Brown University, but are running into a snag. Looks like the documentation
points to a dead link for Step 3 of the freesurfer_linux_developers_page
13 matches
Mail list logo