Looking at the image posted previously.
https://yalesurvey.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_ddwW7I9yMQuCtPn
I think it is pretty clear the 5.1 picture has better gray/white contrast.
It is a very subtle difference, but you can see it if you look at some
pieces of
wm that were missed by 5.2 in this
The 5.2 image has been smoothed, by a small degree, relative to 5.1.
Either prior to FS processing or by FS, it would seem.
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 3:29 AM, Christopher Bell
christopherbell2...@gmail.com wrote:
Looking at the image posted previously.
https://yalesurvey.qualtrics.com/SE
I have encountered this error in the past, and I think it was because I was
not
sourcing SetUpFreeSurfer.sh correctly. That is the the script
that sets up the MNI_DIR I think.
echo $MNI_DIR or whatever it is called and it should show you
if it is being setup properly. It may be pointing to the
:03 AM, Douglas N Greve
gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.eduwrote:
Hi Chris, I don't think there is such a tool. One thing you can do is to
use the aparc+aseg.mgz as the source instead of the lh and rh surfaces
separately. This might solve all of your problems.
doug
On 07/06/2012 12:02 PM, Christopher
I believe this post slipped through the cracks. Anyone have any thoughts
on this nu_correct error. Some subjects ran fine, so it seems to be an
intermittent
problem and not an installation problem.
Also, is this possibly related to the avi_talairach/intensity normalization
issues
being discussed
How much is the dilation (perpendicular to the cortical surface) for
the creation of the white matter ROIs? Is there a citation for this?
Chris Bell
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
I have run a bunch of cases through bbregister and overall it worked great!
315 out of about 325 cases
the alignments were very good, but on 10 subjects it did very poorly. I can
not so far find anything unusual
about this data. Per earlier posts, I have tried the different
initilization options
How do I obtain a freesurfer license file?
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed.
-03-03 at 20:41 -0600, Christopher Bell wrote:
FreeSurfers,
I have been analyzing my qdec data in version 5.0 and have some
interesting although somewhat confusing results. Basically I have run
a very simple analysis with DODS and DOSS. My discrete factor is group
and my covariate is age
