Looking at the image posted previously..... https://yalesurvey.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_ddwW7I9yMQuCtPn
I think it is pretty clear the 5.1 picture has better gray/white contrast. It is a very subtle difference, but you can see it if you look at some pieces of wm that were "missed" by 5.2 in this image. On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Yang, Daniel <yung-jui.y...@yale.edu>wrote: > Thanks Nick! I have uploaded the relevant files to you. > > Thanks, > Daniel > > -- > Yung-Jui "Daniel" Yang, PhD > Postdoctoral Researcher > Yale Child Study Center > New Haven, CT > (203) 737-5454 > > > > > > > On 4/10/13 1:19 PM, "Nick Schmansky" <ni...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote: > > >Daniel, > > > >We're repeating our paired-analysis of thickness measures between 5.1 > >and 5.2. In the meantime, to check for correctness, open the > >brain.finalsurfs.mgz file with the surfaces overlayed, and check the > >intensity value of the voxels which appear to be non-cortical 'black > >spaces', relative to neighboring gm voxels. ignore the aseg.mgz gm > >voxels, as those are not accurate (ie, dont load aseg.mgz when > >inspecting surfaces, or at least turn if off when inspecting gm > >regions....its still handy to see where hippocampus sits). > > > >Nick > > > > > >On Wed, 2013-04-10 at 11:11 +0000, Yang, Daniel wrote: > >> Dear FreeSurfer Experts and Users, > >> > >> Did anyone find similar things using FS 5.2 (please see my previous post > >> below)? That is, FS 5.2 is including more non-cortical "black spaces" > >> within pial surfaces, compared to FS 5.1? > >> > >> I'm not interested in nitpicking but I feel this is a rather serious > >> issue, so I would like to raise it again before it's completely > >>forgotten. > >> > >> At the meantime I keep receiving Emails from people asking me this > >>issue. > >> > >> Thanks! > >> Daniel > >> > > > > > > > > > >The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it > >is > >addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the > >e-mail > >contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance > >HelpLine at > >http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in > >error > >but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and > >properly > >dispose of the e-mail. > > > _______________________________________________ > Freesurfer mailing list > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer >
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
