/greve/mri_probedicom.mac
On 08/10/2015 08:31 AM, Eiran Vadim Harel wrote:
Hello Freesurfers,
I am using freesurfer-Darwin-snowleopard-i686-stable-pub-v5.3.0.
I tried unpacking mosaic functional dicoms taken with siemens prisma
scanner using:
dcmunpack -src
/users/eiran/Desktop/BSMT/201_
Hello Freesurfers,I am using
freesurfer-Darwin-snowleopard-i686-stable-pub-v5.3.0.I tried unpacking mosaic
functional dicoms taken with siemens prisma scanner using:
dcmunpack -src /users/eiran/Desktop/BSMT/201_/Study20150415_184518_65000 -targ
/Applications/freesurfer/BSMT_PROJECT/bsmt201 -run
you look at
group.glm/mask.nii.gz and see if there are a bunch of isolated voxels?
On 03/05/2015 11:50 PM, Eiran Vadim Harel wrote:
Hi Doug,
Thanks for your reply.
This is the terminal output:
[Eran-Harels-MacBook-Pro:doors_group_51014/doors11.lh/r-vs-nr] eiran%
mri_glmfit --y
N Greve wrote:
Can you upload the ces.nii.gz and cesvar.nii.gz files to our filedrop?f
On 03/06/2015 12:23 PM, Eiran Vadim Harel wrote:
Hi Doug,
It seems ok, no isolated voxels.
I attach it.
Any other ideas?
Thanks,
Eiran
On Friday, March 6, 2015 6:22 PM, Douglas N Greve
gr
/06/2015 12:38 PM, Douglas N Greve wrote:
Can you upload the ces.nii.gz and cesvar.nii.gz files to our filedrop?f
On 03/06/2015 12:23 PM, Eiran Vadim Harel wrote:
Hi Doug,
It seems ok, no isolated voxels.
I attach it.
Any other ideas?
Thanks,
Eiran
On Friday, March 6, 2015
@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
That is strange. Can you send the full terminal output from the first
call to mri_glmfit-sim?
doug
On 02/23/2015 03:49 AM, Eiran Vadim Harel wrote:
Hello Freesurfers,
I use freesurfer v5.3.0
When I do group analysis correction for multiple comparisons for lh as
follows
Hello Freesurfers,
I use freesurfer v5.3.0
When I do group analysis correction for multiple comparisons for lh as follows:
mri_glmfit --y ces.nii.gz --wls cesvar.nii.gz --osgm --glmdir group.glm
--nii.gz --surface fsaverage lh
mri_glmfit-sim --glmdir group.glm --cache 3 pos --cwpvalthresh .0166
Hello Freesurfers,
I use freesurfer v5.3.0
When I do group analysis correction for multiple comparisons for lh as follows:
mri_glmfit --y ces.nii.gz --wls cesvar.nii.gz --osgm --glmdir group.glm
--nii.gz --surface fsaverage lh
mri_glmfit-sim --glmdir group.glm --cache 3 pos --cwpvalthresh .0166
Hi all,
Is there a change in the unpacking of the MPRAGE and DICOM files?
The names of the files have changed.
what file name should be put in the command:
recon-all -i./file name -s subjectname
Thanks,
Eiran
___
Freesurfer mailing list
data here.
doug
On 09/14/2012 11:06 AM, Eiran Vadim Harel wrote:
Hi all,
Is there a change in the unpacking of the MPRAGE and DICOM files?
The names of the files have changed.
what file name should be put in the command:
recon-all -i./file name -s subjectname
Thanks,
Eiran
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
recon-all -s exited with ERRORS at Fri Sep 14 13:32:22 EDT 2012
/cluster/archive/301/siemens/TrioTim-35101-20120912-135155-195000/MR.1.3.12.2.1107.5.2.32.35101.3.2012091214284986179598358
On 09/14/2012 01:01 PM, Eiran Vadim Harel wrote:
Hi,
3
Hi,
I am using stable5.0-env.
I have run the pre[processing command:
preproc-sess -s 1411_MC -surface fsaverage lhrh -mni305 -fwhm 5 -per-run
I got this ERROR message:
/autofs/space/shimshon_002/users/eiran/contproc/1411_MC
RunList: 005 006 007
--- ** ---
Hello,
I did an FIR analysis and want to get the activation measure for specific ROI
at consequent time frames.
mkanalysis-sess -analysis context_FIR.rh -surface fsaverage rh -fwhm 5
-paradigm sca_wca.par -event-related -fir 4.4 17.6 -refeventdur 2.2 -mcextreg
-TR 2.2 -nconditions 2
13 matches
Mail list logo
