othing makes it look better, but
even with 10mm of smoothing, it's unclear if the fieldsigns are correct. How
can I track down the problems with the fieldsign maps?
Thanks in advance!
--Greg
________
Greg Burgess, Ph.D.
St
,
--Greg
Greg Burgess, Ph.D.
Staff Scientist, Human Connectome Project
Washington University School of Medicine
Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology
Email: burge...@pcg.wustl.edu
Greg Burgess, Ph.D.
Staff Scientist, Human Connectome Project
Washington University School of Medicine
Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology
Email: burge...@pcg.wustl.edu
On Mar 23, 2012, at 9:51 AM, Bruce Fischl wrote:
> Hi Greg
>
> do you see this on all your datasets? I don
rcle around the
medial wall. I've tried putting cut points so close that they're nearly on top
of each other, but it still doesn't help.
Does anyone have an idea why this won't cut right?
Thanks,
--Greg
________
Greg Bu
wrote:
> Did you happen to change the surface for your subject between the time you
> ran preprocessing and the time you ran fieldsign-sess? It looks like the
> number of vertices changed.
> doug
>
> Greg Burgess wrote:
>> Hi freesurfers,
>>
>> I'm gettin
ke all -dontrun
recon-all -vno-check -s CP10021_v5
but no issues are reported, and I can't find any issues in the log files or
output.
Can anyone suggest a next step?
Thanks,
--Greg
________
Greg Burgess, Ph.D.
Staff Scienti
following magic:
fslmaths /PATH/TO/IMAGE.nii /PATH/TO/IMAGE.nii
A potentially better long-term fix is to switch dicom to nifti converters.
We've been having success with dcm2nii, which is part of mricron.
Good luck,
--Greg
______