Re: [Freesurfer] Using pre-segmented results

2019-12-10 Thread Jordi Huguet
Dec 5, 2019, 18:36 Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. wrote: > If your WM volume is not conformed, you will need to conform it with > mri_convert yourwm.mgz --conform wm.mgz > > > On 12/5/19 4:24 AM, Jordi Huguet wrote: > > > > External Email - Use Caution > > >

Re: [Freesurfer] Using pre-segmented results

2019-12-05 Thread Jordi Huguet
e T1w images) are 320 rows x 320 columns in 240 frames. Seems like FreeSurfer expects them to be cubic, correct? Would that fix the problem if I add 80 frames of zeroes (or ones) to my volumes? Any other ideas of what I might be doing wrong? Regards, Jordi On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 8:47 AM Jordi Huguet

Re: [Freesurfer] Using pre-segmented results

2019-11-27 Thread Jordi Huguet
then run recon-all -s FOO -all > > > On 11/27/2019 12:39 PM, Jordi Huguet wrote: > > External Email - Use Caution > Hi Bruce, > > Many thanks for your reply. > > I understand from your answer that it could be done as follows (I am not > an expert in Fr

Re: [Freesurfer] Using pre-segmented results

2019-11-27 Thread Jordi Huguet
etain them > > cheers > Bruce > > > On Tue, 26 Nov 2019, Jordi Huguet wrote: > > > > > External Email - Use Caution > > > > Hi there, > > I wonder if its somehow possible to feed FreeSurfer's recon-all with > pre-existing segm

[Freesurfer] Using pre-segmented results

2019-11-26 Thread Jordi Huguet
FreeSurfer's WM segmentation output is not optimal so I am looking for alternatives to improve the final results on such specific cases without requiring any manual intervention. Any comments, examples or shared reflections on this regard are kindly welcome. Thanks in a