e
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016, Kok, JG (neuro) wrote:
> Hi Bruce,
>
> Thanks for your quick reply. I do not have manually split asegs, I wish to
> create them all automatically. I'm hoping it is possible to read
> RB_all_2008-03-26.gca (preferably in MATLAB, using fread), and adjust a
in
to create a new gca that has the separated putamen. You'll need to add a
couple of entries to FreeSurferColorLUT.txt to specify how to display and
name the new entries as well
cheers
Bruce
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016, Kok, JG (neuro) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wish to split the putamen in an
Hi Ed,
I'm not sure if this'll help you, but I read your question right after I posted
mine, and thought to let you know the solution I used in cases where I had to
add control points:
"
Or Make Life Easier
recon-all -make all -s subjid
"
is copied from one of the Freesurfer Powerpoint slides
Hi,
I wish to split the putamen in an anterior part and a posterior part in >60
subjects which have been analyzed by the recon-all stream (FS version 5.3.0).
Ideally, I would split the putamen in the atlas (e.g., at the coronal plane
through the anterior commissure) and apply this "new" atlas t
Dear Freesurfer experts,
I would be very interested in using the PVC correction software for PET images,
that will be available within Freesurfer version 6. Would you be able to
estimate a date for the release of the stable release of version 6 (I realize
this may be difficult)? Depending on yo
erwerp: Re: [Freesurfer] quality T1 for new study
Hi Jelmer
the scan looks quite nice to me. Have you run it through recon-all? That
is the best way to get an idea of how well it will work.
cheers
Bruce
On Fri, 18 Apr
2014, Kok, JG (neuro) wrote:
> Dear Freesurfer experts,
>
> I uplo
Dear Freesurfer experts,
I uploaded a .nii.gz file (which can be downloaded from
'http://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2/?p=7pbsgklemux'). I hope you would
be willing to comment on the quality of this scan for use with Freesurfer (you
can find some parameters below; the scan was acquired on
] quality T1 scans for new study
sure, that would be fine. Upload teh whole dataset and we will take a
look
Bruce
On Wed, 2 Apr 2014, Kok, JG (neuro) wrote:
> Hi Bruce,
>
> Thank you very much for your time. I was just talking to our physicist on
> this subject, and he said, as you judge
nsion. What coil are you using? Are you using sense?
cheers
Bruce
On Wed, 2 Apr 2014, Kok, JG (neuro) wrote:
> Dear Bruce, Andre, someone else,
>
> I think I caused some misunderstanding yesterday for which I am sorry. Now I
> do not know on what parameters Andre commented. So to hope
Verzonden: dinsdag 1 april 2014 18:10
Aan: Freesurfer support list
CC: Andre van der Kouwe
Onderwerp: Re: [Freesurfer] quality T1 scans for new study
no, I just looked at the ones in the body of your email
On Tue, 1 Apr 2014,
Kok, JG (neuro) wrote:
> Dear Bruce and Andre,
>
> PS I am sor
o be fine...
Thanks,
Jelmer
Van: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
[freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] namens Kok, JG (neuro)
[j.g.ko...@umcg.nl]
Verzonden: dinsdag 1 april 2014 16:45
Aan: Freesurfer support list
Onderwerp: Re: [Freesurfer] quality T1 sca
st
Cc: Andre van der Kouwe
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] quality T1 scans for new study
looks pretty reasonable. Andre: any comments/suggestions?
On Tue, 1 Apr
2014, Kok, JG (neuro) wrote:
> Hi Bruce,
>
> Thanks for your fast reply.
>
> Hereby I attach the parameter files of both scans
e us the specific acquisition details we can help more (receive
coil, acceleration, voxel size, sequence type, TR/TE/TI/flip
angle/bandwidth, etc). We also have recommended morphometry sequences
on our website.
10 min is a pretty long structural scan for a modern MRI scanner.
cheers
Bruce
O
13 matches
Mail list logo
