Hi FreeSurfer experts,
I would like to use the asegstats2table and the aparcstats2table commands
on my longitudinal data, which have been processing following the
longitudinal pipeline (recon-all -cross, - base and finally -long). And I
have two questions :
1) Am I obliged to do the
Hi FreeSurfer experts,
I would like to use the asegstats2table and the aparcstats2table commands
on my longitudinal data, that have been processing following the
longitudinal pipeline (recon-all -cross, - base and finally -long). And I
have two questions :
1) Am I obliged to do the
Dear FreeSurfer expert,
I would like to use the new destrieux atlas for extracting anatomical data
with the aparcstat2table command. Is that possible ? If yes can you give me
the command ? Or give me some references that can help me ?
Thanks in advance
Best regards
Lisa
Hi everyone,
During my PhD, I'm using some longitudinal data and at the setp called
"BASE" but when i want to make a qcache processing with the last version of
FreeSurfer (i.e. 6.0)(command used : "*recon-all -base template_1-02
-qcache*") it doesn't work. I have a error message :
"Error : cannot
Hello everyone,
I'm using the new version of FreeSurfer processing with longitudinal image
processing. And at the step -base after a recon-all processing i would like
to make a qcache processing but it doesn't work... "cannot find
[...]/template_1-01VALAL/surf/lh.w-g.pct.mgh" (See in attachment
because of dura left in the
> brainmask.
>
> cheers
> Bruce
>
> On Wed, 21 Jun 2017, Lisa Delalande wrote:
>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> I am a PhD student and faced a problem with Freesurfer, more specially
>> with
>> segmentation. First of al
Hi,
I am a PhD student and faced a problem with Freesurfer, more specially with
segmentation. First of all, I did a typical qsub command. However, when I
cheked with tkmedit, I saw problems of brainsmask. Indeed, meninges are
often considered as grey matter.
I tried these different commands :
Hello everyone,
I would like to know if there are big differences between the new verson
6.0 versus the old one 5.3 regarding the recon-all and qcache processing ?
Thanks,
Best regards,
Lisa
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Hello everyone,
I would like to know if the new version of FreeSurfer bring a lot of
changes for the longitudinal procesing like recon-all and qcache ? I
started to processing them with FreeSurfer 5.3, Do you think I should start
again with FreeSurfer 6.0 ?
Thanks a lot in advance
Best regards
correlate a behavioral score with SURFACE values when I
found these values thanks to a THICKNESS analysis?
I hope it's clearer,
If not do not hesitate to ask me again,
Thanks in advance.
Marine
De : Lisa Delalande <delalande.l...@outlook.fr>
Envoyé : vendredi 31 m
ying to do. It
sounds like you have done a thickenss analysis where you have found some
clusters, but after that I'm not sure what you are asking. Please elaborate.
doug
On 3/28/17 6:07 AM, Lisa Delalande wrote:
Hello,
As a PhD student, I often use Freesurfer software and more precisely Q
Hello,
As a PhD student, I often use Freesurfer software and more precisely QDEC. A
great question arises in connection with my last work. After drawing ROIs, I
extricated values thanks to a " .levels" and a creation of a "stat" folder for
each participant (aparcstat2table).
My question is :
Jan 9, 2017 at 3:46 PM, Lisa Delalande
<delalande.l...@outlook.fr<mailto:delalande.l...@outlook.fr>> wrote:
Dear all,
I would like to know how to make an ROI an FreeSurfer/QDEC with precise
coordinates. More precisely, I want an ROI called IFC consisting of combined
pars opercular
a part de Lisa Delalande
<delalande.l...@outlook.fr>
Envoyé : lundi 9 janvier 2017 15:46
À : freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Objet : [Freesurfer] ROI with precise coordinates
Dear all,
I would like to know how to make an ROI an FreeSurfer/QDEC with precise
coordinates. More precisely, I
Dear all,
I would like to know how to make an ROI an FreeSurfer/QDEC with precise
coordinates. More precisely, I want an ROI called IFC consisting of combined
pars opercularis and pars triangularis and with a box of 10 x 10 x 10 mm
size, centered at MNI coordinates 10,-15,-5. Does a
Hello,
I made an analysis thanks to the QDEC tool :
I tested a correlation between an inhibition score and cortical thickness,
corrected for age
(continuous = inhibition score ; nuisance = age ; smoothing = 25 and FDR
corrected)
*** * ** *** * *** *** *** **
Hello,
As a PhD student, I send you this mail because i am meeting a misunderstanding
with QDEC.
In a few words :
I made an analysis thanks to the QDEC tool :
* I tested a correlation between an inhibition score and cortical
thickness, corrected for age
(continuous = inhibition score ;
that's what I thought !
Thanks a lot for your help !
Best regards !
Lisa
2016-03-15 17:31 GMT+01:00 Douglas N Greve <gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>:
> you cannot have more than two levels of a factor in qdec. You can use
> the "command line" stream. See the wiki
>
>
Hello everyone,
I've got some problems with qdec. I have .levels with more than 2 factors.
For example a "grpe.levels" with three factors : children (enfant), adults
(adultes) and nothing (rien). But if I want to exclude some subjects
like children qdec doesn't work anymore (attachment : error
Hello everyone,
I've got some problems with qdec. I have .levels with more than 2 factors. For
example a "grpe.levels" with three factors : children (enfant), adults
(adultes) and nothing (rien). But if I want to exclude some subjects like
children qdec doesn't work anymore
Hi,
I would like to know if, in doing a longitudinal study (i.e. 2 or 3 MRI
each subjects), this is usual to have many file for one subject (see the
picture, 5 file for one subject with two MRI : a0009_1 = MRI 1 and a0009_2
= MRI 2) ? Because in the future I will have around 100 subjects with 3
21 matches
Mail list logo
