Hi Kari
what do you mean when you say "when I look at them in freeviewer the voxels
are definitely not in the correct spot". Do you mean the spectroscopy
voxels?
cheers
Bruce
On Fri, 22 Jul 2016, Kari Parsons wrote:
> Hi Bruce,
>
> Yes, I agree it doesn't seem right. They're LAG and AC
Hi Bruce,
Yes, I agree it doesn't seem right. They're LAG and ACG (I'm using
spectroscopy voxels as my ROIs). The surfaces look reasonable when I'm running
through the suggested steps on the freesurfer website for getting the surface
thickness when using an roi as a mask, but when I look
Hi Kari
the average thickness in some ROIs is 5mm??? Like which ones? That
certainly seems like something is wrong. Do the surfaces look accurate?
What were the parameters/resolution/sequence of the data you gave to
recon-all?
cheers
Bruce
On Fri, 3 Jun 2016, Kari Parsons wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
Hi,
I'm using ROI masks (spectroscopy voxels) to get cortical thickness
values. I'm pretty much following the tutorial online
('VolumeRoiCorticalThickness') as I'm quite new to Freesurfer. It looks like
Freesurfer has a maximum of cortical thickness ceiling at 5 mm, and I'm getting
that
