orginal thread.
> I hope this works!
>
> I am pasting the previous emails below.
>
> Thanks again, Doug.
>
>
> Re: [Freesurfer] Extracting structural measures from trend-level PET
> clusters
>
> <http://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harv
Extracting structural measures from trend-level PET
clusters
<http://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu=subject:%22Re%5C%3A+%5C%5BFreesurfer%5C%5D+Extracting+structural+measures+from+trend%5C-level+PET+clusters%22=newest>
Douglas N Greve
<http://www.mail-a
Hi Elijah, can you repost with previous correspondence included? We get
a lot of emails here and can't keep track of each person's issue. thanks!
doug
On 11/11/2016 08:06 PM, Elijah Mak wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A bit more info: the stack of thickness maps consists of
>
Hi,
A bit more info: the stack of thickness maps consists of
lh.thickness.fwhm15.fsaverage.mghs that were created after -qcache. I used
mri_concat --f --o to create the stack of mghs. I also noticed that the
vertex values are in the range of 20-30, whereas those in the
lh.thickness.fsvaerage
Thanks, Doug.
It works but I am not sure if the values I'm getting are correct. Is this
supposed to be reporting the mean cortical thickness of each cluster? I
have pasted the output below from the avgwf below. The names of the
clusters correspond to the regions from the "summary" text, am I
You can just
mri_segstats --i thickness.stack.mgh --seg cache.th30.pos.sig.ocn.nii.gz
--excludeid 0 --avgwf thickness.stack.cluster.dat
Each row in thickness.stack.cluster.dat will be a subject, and each
column is a cluster
On 11/09/2016 04:16 PM, Elijah Mak wrote:
> Hi Freesurfer Team,
>
Hi Freesurfer Team,
1) We've found some subtle differences in tau accumulation between two
groups. Unfortunately, it does not survive mri_glmfit-sim (voxel threshold
0.001, cwp < 0.05). Still, I would like to extract the structural measures
from the uncorrected tau clusters (p<0.001). What is the
