(Questions for all, but maybe more directed towards Martin)
I have some questions about manual edits in regard to the longitudinal stream.
Based on the current info on the wiki page, it appears that no edits are pushed
forward from the cross-sectional (initial) runs of the subject data, as any
Bumping this back up to the list. Could someone please address?
To be more concise, during longitudinal processing, where are wm/gm edits made?
On the cross-sectional runs, to the base, or on the .long. runs themselves?
Thanks.
-Derin
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Derin Cobia
> Date:
edits should be made to the cross-sectional subjects and the base
subjects. edits do not need to be made to the longitudinal runs, as
they will be transferred from the cross-sectional subject run. the base
subject does not get edits transferred from the composing set of
cross-sectional subjects b
Hi Derin,
this is how I see it:
The base might need edits and if it does, they should be made. As you
say, the surfaces of the longitudinal runs are initialized with the
surface of the base, so, if it is not correct, this will pollute all
time points.
Another reason to edit the base is that wm e
Hi Nick (and Martin)
Could you please clarify if the edits come only from the base or if they are
copied from the cross-sectionals ?
It would be great if I only had to make edit in the base .
We have 5 timepoints for each subject (each a year apart) and i want to use
the results from the longit
You can edit just the base if you will only be working with the
longitudinal stream. Currently, running the cross-sectional stream is
necessary only to get the 'norm.mgz' file, for input to the base
subject.
n.
On Sun, 2010-02-14 at 14:06 -0800, Mehul Sampat wrote:
> Hi Nick (and Martin)
>
> C
