Hi,
what kind of information can I get with FreeSUrfer about MS lesions? Number of
lesions? Lesion volume?
Thanks,
Miguel.
Veja quais são os assuntos do momento no Yahoo! +Buscados
http://br.maisbusca
I don't think FreeSurfer will give any direct measure of MS. In the wiki
page of FreeSurfer there's a paper about MS:
http://www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/~fischl/reprints/Brain2003v126p1734Sailercorticalthickness.pdf
---
Pedro Paulo de M. Oliveira
Hi Miguel,
I think Koen Van Leemput (ccd) has some tools for this, but in general we
don't characterize MS lesions much, although we do generically label
damaged white matter.
cheers,
Bruce
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009, Jose Soares wrote:
Hi,
what kind of information can I get with FreeSUrfer abou
Dear Freesurfer experts,
We are facing a problem in our study and would need your advice on it.
We want to get an accurate measurement for the cortical thickness from our
MS patients data. For that we are using 3D T1 and FLAIR (recon-all will be
used with the FLAIR option so that we can a more acc
I Ismail
yes, if you have juxtacortical lesions you should label them as such in
the aseg, then I think it should work
cheers
Bruce
On Fri, 9 Dec 2016, Ismail Koubiyr
wrote:
> Dear Freesurfer experts,
> We are facing a problem in our study and would need your advice on it.
> We want to get an
Hi Bruce,
Thanks for your answer.
What do you think would be better, run recon-all on the original data (with
lesions) then edit the aseg for the juxtacortical lesions or use a lesion
filling on the T1 and then run recon-all on it.
Thanks again.
Cheers,
Ismail
PhD candidate
Neurocentre Magendie
the former I think, but it's an empirical question
Bruce
On Mon, 12 Dec 2016, Ismail Koubiyr wrote:
> Hi Bruce,
> Thanks for your answer.
> What do you think would be better, run recon-all on the original data (with
> lesions) then edit the aseg for the juxtacortical lesions or use a lesion
> fill
Would you please give me the reasons why the former would be better ?
Ismail
PhD candidate
Neurocentre Magendie, INSERM
Bordeaux, France
2016-12-12 15:47 GMT+01:00 Bruce Fischl :
> the former I think, but it's an empirical question
> Bruce
> On Mon, 12 Dec 2016, Ismail Koubiyr wrote:
>
> > Hi
because filling in the T1 may cause artifacts
On Mon, 12 Dec 2016, Ismail
Koubiyr wrote:
Would you please give me the reasons why the former would be better ?
Ismail
PhD candidate
Neurocentre Magendie, INSERM
Bordeaux, France
2016-12-12 15:47 GMT+01:00 Bruce Fischl :
the former I thin
Alright, thanks a lot for your help Bruce.
Best,
Ismail
PhD candidate
Neurocentre Magendie, INSERM
Bordeaux, France
2016-12-12 17:33 GMT+01:00 Bruce Fischl :
> because filling in the T1 may cause artifacts
>
> On Mon, 12 Dec 2016, Ismail Koubiyr wrote:
>
> Would you please give me the reasons
10 matches
Mail list logo