Alright, thanks a lot for your help Bruce.

Best,

Ismail

PhD candidate
Neurocentre Magendie, INSERM
Bordeaux, France

2016-12-12 17:33 GMT+01:00 Bruce Fischl <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>:

> because filling in the T1 may cause artifacts
>
> On Mon, 12 Dec 2016, Ismail Koubiyr wrote:
>
> Would you please give me the reasons why the former would be better ?
>> Ismail
>>
>> PhD candidate
>> Neurocentre Magendie, INSERM
>> Bordeaux, France
>>
>>
>> 2016-12-12 15:47 GMT+01:00 Bruce Fischl <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>:
>>       the former I think, but it's an empirical question
>>       Bruce
>>       On Mon, 12 Dec 2016, Ismail Koubiyr wrote:
>>
>>       > Hi Bruce,
>>       > Thanks for your answer.
>>       > What do you think would be better, run recon-all on the original
>> data (with
>>       > lesions) then edit the aseg for the juxtacortical lesions or use
>> a lesion
>>       > filling on the T1 and then run recon-all on it.
>>       > Thanks again.
>>       >
>>       > Cheers,
>>       >
>>       > Ismail
>>       >
>>       > PhD candidate
>>       > Neurocentre Magendie, INSERM
>>       > Bordeaux, France
>>       >
>>       > 2016-12-09 22:58 GMT+01:00 Bruce Fischl <
>> fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>:
>>       >       I Ismail
>>       >
>>       >       yes, if you have juxtacortical lesions you should label
>> them as
>>       >       such in
>>       >       the aseg, then I think it should work
>>       >
>>       >       cheers
>>       >       Bruce
>>       >       On Fri, 9 Dec 2016, Ismail Koubiyr
>>       >       wrote:
>>       >
>>       >       > Dear Freesurfer experts,
>>       >       > We are facing a problem in our study and would need your
>>       >       advice on it.
>>       >       > We want to get an accurate measurement for the cortical
>>       >       thickness from our
>>       >       > MS patients data. For that we are using 3D T1 and FLAIR
>>       >       (recon-all will be
>>       >       > used with the FLAIR option so that we can a more accurate
>> pial
>>       >       surface).
>>       >       > However, we were wondering if running recon-all on the raw
>>       >       data would lead
>>       >       > to some errors specially because of the juxtacortical
>> lesions
>>       >       or not. Or, is
>>       >       > it better to first apply a lesion filling using our lesion
>>       >       mask ?
>>       >       > I should specify that we will use the longitudinal
>> pipeline if
>>       >       it is of any
>>       >       > use.
>>       >       >
>>       >       > Thank you all.
>>       >       >
>>       >       > Ismail
>>       >       >
>>       >       > PhD candidate
>>       >       > Neurocentre Magendie, INSERM
>>       >       > Bordeaux, France
>>       >       >
>>       >       >
>>       > _______________________________________________
>>       > Freesurfer mailing list
>>       > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>       > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>       >
>>       >
>>       > The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to
>> whom
>>       > it is
>>       > addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error
>> and the
>>       > e-mail
>>       > contains patient information, please contact the Partners
>> Compliance
>>       > HelpLine at
>>       > http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent
>> to you
>>       > in error
>>       > but does not contain patient information, please contact the
>> sender
>>       > and properly
>>       > dispose of the e-mail.
>>       >
>>       >
>>       >
>>       >
>>       _______________________________________________
>>       Freesurfer mailing list
>>       Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>       https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>
> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it
> is
> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
> e-mail
> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
> HelpLine at
> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in
> error
> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and
> properly
> dispose of the e-mail.
>
>
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

Reply via email to