Re: [Freesurfer] Origin of freesusrfer output

2018-08-07 Thread Ritesh Mahajan
External Email - Use Caution Thanks Doug, For your kind detailed replies. This is really great help. - Original Message - From: "Douglas Greve" To: "freesurfer" Sent: Tuesday, August 7, 2018 9:01:01 PM Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Origin of freesusrfer

Re: [Freesurfer] Origin of freesusrfer output

2018-08-07 Thread Douglas Greve
way from this. > > Thanks, > Ritesh Mahajan > > Thanks, > Ritesh Mahajan > > - Original Message - > From: "Douglas N. Greve" > To: "freesurfer" > Sent: Monday, August 6, 2018 9:22:29 PM > Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Origin of freesusrfer out

Re: [Freesurfer] Origin of freesusrfer output

2018-08-06 Thread Ritesh Mahajan
: "Douglas N. Greve" To: "freesurfer" Sent: Monday, August 6, 2018 9:22:29 PM Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Origin of freesusrfer output also, check out this web page http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/CoordinateSystems On 08/05/2018 11:23 AM, Bruce Fischl wrote: > Hi

Re: [Freesurfer] Origin of freesusrfer output

2018-08-06 Thread Douglas N. Greve
> Also, can you tell what mathematical formula or equation is used >> convert this origin ? >> >> Thanks, >> Ritesh Mahajan >> >> - Original Message - >> From: "Douglas Greve" >> To: "freesurfer" >> Sent: Friday, Augu

Re: [Freesurfer] Origin of freesusrfer output

2018-08-05 Thread Bruce Fischl
51:30 PM Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Origin of freesusrfer output To add on, the origin is changed in that the "first voxel" is not the same in the 256^3 volume as it is in the original dicom. Having said that, all our files (eg, mgz and nifti) have a  matrix that converts a col, row, slic

Re: [Freesurfer] Origin of freesusrfer output

2018-08-05 Thread Ritesh Mahajan
- From: "Douglas Greve" To: "freesurfer" Sent: Friday, August 3, 2018 9:51:30 PM Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Origin of freesusrfer output To add on, the origin is changed in that the "first voxel" is not the same in the 256^3 volume as it is in the original dic

Re: [Freesurfer] Origin of freesusrfer output

2018-08-03 Thread Douglas Greve
To add on, the origin is changed in that the "first voxel" is not the same in the 256^3 volume as it is in the original dicom. Having said that, all our files (eg, mgz and nifti) have a  matrix that converts a col, row, slice into the scanner RAS, so you can always find your way back to the

Re: [Freesurfer] Origin of freesusrfer output

2018-08-03 Thread Bruce Fischl
Hi Ritesh Doug can correct any inaccuracies, but 1. Yes, unless you tell recon-all not to. 2. I'm not sure what you mean by the origin, but we do keep track of the ras coordinates of the center of the volume after resampling (the so-called "cras"). 3. We do keep track of the original dicom

[Freesurfer] Origin of freesusrfer output

2018-08-03 Thread Ritesh Mahajan
External Email - Use Caution Hi Bruce, 1) Free-surfer output is always 256*256*256, regardless of any input dimensions. 2) I have a doubt, while doing this re-sampling from input dimension to 256*256*256. Does free-surfer change the origin of image? 3) My input is an MRI dicom