External Email - Use Caution
Hi,Douglas,
Thanks for your reply! I have changed the classes and the contrast as
your suggestion. But I still met some problem when viewed the results. I still
met the problem when I loaded the sig.mgh file into freeview or qdec. I don't
External Email - Use Caution
Hi,Douglas,
Thanks for your reply! I have changed the classes and the contrast as
your suggestion. But I still met some problem when viewed the results. I still
met the problem when I loaded the sig.mgh file into freeview or qdec. I don't
External Email - Use Caution
Hi,Douglas,
Thanks for your reply! I have changed the classes and the contrast as
your suggestion. But I still met some problem when viewed the results. I still
met the problem when I loaded the sig.mgh file into freeview or qdec. I still
Don't use gender as a continuous variable. You need four classes
(TLE-Male, TLE-Female, etc) and change the contrast to reflect it,
otherwise I think it looks ok. Load the sig.mgh file into freeview (or
the tksurferfv freeview wrapper)
On 2/19/2020 10:31 PM, 邓刊 wrote:
External Emai
External Email - Use Caution
Dear Freesurfer support,
we met some probelm when we investigate difference between two groups. We
have two sets of data, one is the TLE group, the other is the extraTLE. We also
has the variables: age,gender and neuropsychological test scores.
Ty Doug,
Kind regards,
Egil
From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
on behalf of Douglas N Greve
Sent: 23 March 2015 17:45
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Question regarding Qdec vs mri_glmfit outputs
Use the result
Use the result from mri_glmfit.
doug
On 03/20/2015 10:20 AM, Egil Nygaard wrote:
>
> Dear Freesurfer support,
>
> I find the qdec to be very pedagogic in its outlay, and would love to
> use it. However, I find several discrepancies as compared to results
> from the mri_glmfit analyses, and wonde
Dear Freesurfer support,
I find the qdec to be very pedagogic in its outlay, and would love to use it.
However, I find several discrepancies as compared to results from the
mri_glmfit analyses, and wonder why (see description below).
1) One discrepancy is the placement of the clusters; X, Y
