Re: [Freesurfer] Regarding missing DICOM fields

2006-08-29 Thread Niels Bergsland
Hi Doug, Thanks for the quick response. These are for single images. These older files are missing 0020,0032 (ImagePositionPatient) and 0020,0037 (ImageOrientationPatient). It is my understanding that 20,37 is used to establish the direction cosines. The scans were all acquired in the axial

Re: [Freesurfer] Regarding missing DICOM fields

2006-08-29 Thread Doug Greve
No, I don't have anything which allows you to specify them yourself. On the other hand, you can work-around this with something like: mri_probedicom --i slice1.dcm --o slice1.dat slice1.dat will be a binary file of the pixel data from the file slice1.dcm. You can do this for each slice, then

Re: [Freesurfer] Regarding missing DICOM fields

2006-08-29 Thread Niels Bergsland
Thanks for the help Doug! I will let you know how it goes. Niels On 8/29/06, Doug Greve [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No, I don't have anything which allows you to specify them yourself. On the other hand, you can work-around this with something like: mri_probedicom --i slice1.dcm --o slice1.dat

Re: [Freesurfer] Regarding missing DICOM fields

2006-08-28 Thread Doug Greve
Which diom tags do you mean? I think we can get away with not having the Patient Orientation (tag 20,20) -- I'm not sure why I required it in the first place. ImagePositionPatient (tag 20,32) is considerably more important as this is one of the ways the slices are sorted and the direction