[mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] Im Auftrag von Antonin Skoch
Gesendet: Samstag, 15. Juli 2017 00:24
An: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Betreff: Re: [Freesurfer] Switch FreeSurfer Desikan-Killiany atlas to Civet
Dear Trisanna,
thank you for the reference. However, I did not find
Dear Trisanna,
thank you for the reference. However, I did not find any specific information
in this paper what specific methods are used in CIVET and what is the
difference in implementation between CIVET and FreeSurfer.
Antonin
I believe the cortical thickness measures are taken slightly d
On 07/14/2017 05:13 AM, 沙志强 wrote:
> Hello FreeSurfer Developers,
>
> I am attempting to switch the Desikan-Killiany atlas of FreeSurfer to
> Civet. But I have no idea to solve the problem. Would you like to give
> me some suggestions or some detailed steps to help me accomplish the
> tasks ?
I believe the cortical thickness measures are taken slightly differently.
This paper might offer some insights.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4408913/
Trisanna
--
Ph.D. Candidate
McGill University
Integrated Program in Neuroscience
Psychology
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 8:29 AM, Ant
Dear Zhiquiang,
as a regular user of FreeSurfer I am wondering, what is the advantage of using
Civet instead of FreeSurfer?
Are there some functionalities in Civet which are not available in FreeSurfer?
Or does Civet offer better performance/accuracy/precision in estimation of
surface models f
Hello FreeSurfer Developers,
I am attempting to switch the Desikan-Killiany atlas of FreeSurfer to Civet.
But I have no idea to solve the problem. Would you like to give me some
suggestions or some detailed steps to help me accomplish the tasks ?
Best wishes,
Zhiqiang Sha_
