there is not an mri_spmregister (there is spmregister). If you have an
FA map, then I would use bbregister
On 2/25/17 8:03 PM, John Anderson wrote:
Hi Doug, thank you for the detailed response. Highly appreciated!
Kindly. I want to register FA map to structural T1 image using the
command
Hi Antonin,
mni152reg was just meant to replicate the affine registration used by
other software and to provide users with a fast-and-easy way to do
volume-based (subcortical) analysis in FS. I would prefer to use CVS for
everything, but, as you mention, it does have a huge computational
Dear Doug,
thank you for the feedback. In this context I would like to ask you to share
your opinion on the mri_cvs_register. This tool should be far the most accurate
for the registration to MNI, than any of affine-based registration tools,
shouldn't be? Are there any pitfalls/disadvantages
You can do the masking with mri_mask
On 2/26/17 7:04 AM, Shane Schofield wrote:
Dear Doug,
If I want to create a new volume that is registered to the MNIspace
(using mni1525reg), can I mask out other voxels that are not part of
the mni template brain? It is a PET volume (already in
I have not actually tested it on the mni152 reg. It might (probably
does) work fine.
On 2/25/17 5:33 PM, Antonin Skoch wrote:
Dear Doug,
I was wondering, why do you prefer mni152reg to mri_coreg for
gregistration to MNI? According to help, mri_coreg is also able to do
12 DOF registration.
Dear Doug,
If I want to create a new volume that is registered to the MNIspace (using
mni1525reg), can I mask out other voxels that are not part of the mni template
brain? It is a PET volume (already in individual space using bbregister) that
has noisy signals in non-brain regions.
Thank you.
Hi Doug, thank you for the detailed response. Highly appreciated!
Kindly. I want to register FA map to structural T1 image using the command
mri_spmregister as follow:
mri_spmregister move FA.nii --s subj1 --reg reg dat --o FA_2_T1.nii.gz
Is this correct?
Original Message
Dear Doug,
I was wondering, why do you prefer mni152reg to mri_coreg for gregistration to
MNI? According to help, mri_coreg is also able to do 12 DOF registration.
Antonin
mri_coreg is the FS implementation of spm_coreg (spmregister) both of which
use normalized mutual info. bbregister
mri_coreg is the FS implementation of spm_coreg (spmregister) both of
which use normalized mutual info. bbregister uses the BBR cost function
and is preferred for all MRI. For registration to MNI space, we usually
use mni152reg (a wrapper around fsl's flirt)
On 2/25/17 8:49 AM, John Anderson
Dear Freesurfer experts,
I see that the tool "mri_coreg" has been implemented recently in Free Surfer 6
and I really wanted to know what are the differences between the registration
tools "bbregister", " spmregister" and "mri_coreg"! Kindly:
1. Are these tools similar? if not what are the
10 matches
Mail list logo
