___
> From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> on behalf of Douglas N Greve
>
> Sent: 18 November 2016 17:40
> To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] fsaverage_sym LR-flipchecks
>
> Sorry, what are you trying to do? What did you do before you ran
du
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] fsaverage_sym LR-flipchecks
Sorry, what are you trying to do? What did you do before you ran
isxconcat? What was your isxconcat command line?
On 11/18/2016 11:34 AM, James Roe wrote:
> Thanks for your reply, Doug. Registering both LH and RH to fsaverage_sym
> wo
gt;
>>> I was wondering if you know why this is?
>>>
>>> (Resampling each onto the other surface I think shows that it is not a
>>> bias introduced during recon-all of subj1_flipped because the output
>>> is still more symmetrical when performed on in
gt; bias introduced during recon-all of subj1_flipped because the output
>> is still more symmetrical when performed on individual surface and
>> resampled onto fsaverage_sym)
>>
>>
>> thanks!
>>
>>
>> James
>>
>>
>>
etrical when performed on individual surface and
> resampled onto fsaverage_sym)
>
>
> thanks!
>
>
> James
>
>
>
> *From:* freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> on behalf of Douglas Greve
>
> *Sent:* 28 October 2016 18:20
> *To:* freesurfe
From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
on behalf of Douglas Greve
Sent: 28 October 2016 18:20
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] fsaverage_sym LR-flipchecks
Hi James, this looks like a fairly complicated analysis, and I'm not sure I
understand it all. Are the ove
Hi James, this looks like a fairly complicated analysis, and I'm not
sure I understand it all. Are the overlays fMRI or thickness results?
How did you generate, for example, the top left images?
On 10/26/16 3:15 AM, James Roe wrote:
Hi Freesurfer experts
I have an ultimate goal of perfor
