[Freesurfer] glmfit-sim FWHM 34?

2018-07-03 Thread Backhausen, Lea
External Email - Use Caution Dear FreeSurfer experts, I am trying to do vertex-wise comparisons for thickness, surface area and volume between three groups with glmfit. Currently I am using the dev version ( freesurfer-darwin-OSX-ElCapitan-dev-20180627-4a8f901 )

Re: [Freesurfer] glmfit-sim FWHM 34?

2018-07-03 Thread Douglas N. Greve
How much did you smooth by? Is this thickness, area, or volume? Also, in general, you should not be using dev since it is an uncontrolled distribution (ie, there are many things in there that have not been tested). Also, I'm encouraging people to use permutation rather than monte-carlo-based

Re: [Freesurfer] glmfit-sim FWHM 34?

2018-07-12 Thread Backhausen, Lea
stable version? Thanks again, I really appreciate your help! Best, Lea __ Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2018 12:07:01 -0400 From: "Douglas N. Greve" Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] glmfit-sim FWHM 34? To: Message-ID: Content-Type:

Re: [Freesurfer] glmfit-sim FWHM 34?

2018-07-12 Thread Ting Li
External Email - Use Caution Hi Douglas, I try to use permutation but it takes forever. I never see the end. Do I have to update the freesurfer to use the permutation? As it was recommended in this year? Best, Ting > On Jul 3, 2018, at 11:07 AM, Douglas N. Greve wrote: > > A

Re: [Freesurfer] glmfit-sim FWHM 34?

2018-07-15 Thread Douglas Greve
can you send more info? command line, terminal output, what you are analuyzing, etc. If the fwhm is still 34, then something may be wrong. On 7/12/18 11:48 AM, Ting Li wrote: External Email - Use Caution Hi Douglas, I try to use permutation but it takes forever. I never see the end.

Re: [Freesurfer] glmfit-sim FWHM 34?

2018-07-16 Thread Douglas N. Greve
> Thanks again, I really appreciate your help! > > Best, > Lea > > __ > Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2018 12:07:01 -0400 > From: "Douglas N. Greve" > Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] glmfit-sim FWHM 34? > To: > Message-ID: &