On 11/15/2012 05:13 PM, Mahinda Yogarajah wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the reply. I am using the new script and I should correct myself
in that my significant volume changes do seem to correspond (although they
are not completely identical) to areas where there are significant area
Hi,
Thanks for the reply. I am using the new script and I should correct myself in
that my significant volume changes do seem to correspond (although they are not
completely identical) to areas where there are significant area differences (I
see no significant thickness differences between my
Dear Experts,
Given that volume is area x thickness, how would one explain significant
reductions in volume in a qdec anaysis comparing patients and controls, but
not significant differences in area or thickness in the same regions where
volume differences are seen. All analyses use the same
Did you run qcache after installing the new version of preproc-sess? The
new version has a jacobian correction needed to make the area and
volume computations meaningful. If you have not installed the patch, you
can get it from here:
