Hi, Thanks for the reply. I am using the new script and I should correct myself in that my significant volume changes do seem to correspond (although they are not completely identical) to areas where there are significant area differences (I see no significant thickness differences between my groups) - using this kind of vertex wide analysis how does one interpret (biologically) these area differences.
One other quick question regarding monte Carlo correction in qdec - when I use more stringent p thresholds my significant clusters get smaller as one might expect but I also see a completely new, small cluster in the Cingulum which is not seen at less stringent thresholds - is this kind of behaviour ok ? Thanks. Mahinda _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
