Re: [Freesurfer] mri_compute_volume_fractions not filling some sulci properly

2015-09-11 Thread Sebastien Proulx
rd.edu Subject: RE: [Freesurfer] mri_compute_volume_fractions not filling some sulci properly Hi Sebastien that isn't how the algorithm works. If I had to guess, I would guess that what you are seeing is locations with high through-plane curvature so even though a voxel looks like it is

Re: [Freesurfer] mri_compute_volume_fractions not filling some sulci properly

2015-09-11 Thread Bruce Fischl
mgh.harvard.edu Subject: RE: [Freesurfer] mri_compute_volume_fractions not filling some sulci properly there aren't really any workarounds other than using a machine with more ram. Otherwise you can reduce the resolution. Maybe try -r 0. Bruce On Thu, 10 Sep 2015, Sebastien Proulx wrot

Re: [Freesurfer] mri_compute_volume_fractions not filling some sulci properly

2015-09-11 Thread Sebastien Proulx
To: Sebastien Proulx Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: RE: [Freesurfer] mri_compute_volume_fractions not filling some sulci properly there aren't really any workarounds other than using a machine with more ram. Otherwise you can reduce the resolution. Maybe try -r 0. Bruce O

Re: [Freesurfer] mri_compute_volume_fractions not filling some sulci properly

2015-09-10 Thread Bruce Fischl
AM To: Sebastien Proulx Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: RE: [Freesurfer] mri_compute_volume_fractions not filling some sulci properly presumably you mean GB, not MB? That's not enough - a single distance transform of a 256^3 volumes at 0.25 mm is 1GB of 4-8 byte voxels and we have

Re: [Freesurfer] mri_compute_volume_fractions not filling some sulci properly

2015-09-10 Thread Sebastien Proulx
- From: Bruce Fischl [mailto:fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2015 10:15 AM To: Sebastien Proulx Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: RE: [Freesurfer] mri_compute_volume_fractions not filling some sulci properly presumably you mean GB, not MB? That's not enoug

Re: [Freesurfer] mri_compute_volume_fractions not filling some sulci properly

2015-09-10 Thread Bruce Fischl
ginal Message- From: Bruce Fischl [mailto:fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2015 10:06 AM To: Sebastien Proulx Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] mri_compute_volume_fractions not filling some sulci properly how much ram do you have in the machine? You probably need more. Also, ca

Re: [Freesurfer] mri_compute_volume_fractions not filling some sulci properly

2015-09-09 Thread Bruce Fischl
p.s. you can try increasing the resolution of the intermediate volumes using the -r switch. The default is 0.5. Try 0.25 (although this will take 8 times the memory and time I think). Make sure to put the -r 0.25 before before the mandatory options. If this does make things look significantly b

Re: [Freesurfer] mri_compute_volume_fractions not filling some sulci properly

2015-09-09 Thread Bruce Fischl
Hi Sebastien it's pretty hard to tell what's going on from a couple of slices. What was the command line you used? If you upload the subject I'll take a look (I'll need the exact command lines you ran as well). cheers Bruce On Tue, 8 Sep 2015, Sebastien Proulx wrote: My images don’t se

[Freesurfer] mri_compute_volume_fractions not filling some sulci properly

2015-08-31 Thread Sebastien Proulx
Hello Freesurfers, I have been using mri_compute_volume_fractions for a while and I just noticed something weird. Some clearly csf pixels (sometime very large groups) are not filled in the *.csf.mgz image mri_compute_volume_fractions produces The first following figure shows a posterior coronal