Thanks, Doug.
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Douglas Greve
wrote:
> Hi Corinna,
>
> In each iteration, the mc-full replaces your data (--y) with white
> gaussian noise, smoothes it, then computes the GLM and p-values from the t
> or F-test. The mc-z ignores your data entirely and creates a si
Hi Corinna,
In each iteration, the mc-full replaces your data (--y) with white
gaussian noise, smoothes it, then computes the GLM and p-values from the
t or F-test. The mc-z ignores your data entirely and creates a single
frame of WGN in each iteration, smoothes it, rescales it back to a z,
t
Hi all,
I am wondering what the specific reasons might be for choosing to run the
mc-z simulation compared to mc-full? What are the pros and cons for each
method for looking at group morphometry differences?
Thanks
Corinna
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Fr
