Thanks Bruce,
I have uploaded the directory (I think) to the ftp site
(/incoming/incoming/407-M087). Please let me know if it doesn't arrive and
I will try again.
Kind regards,
- Charles
On 26 March 2013 12:53, Bruce Fischl wrote:
> That is pretty bad. I'll try to investigate soon if you c
That is pretty bad. I'll try to investigate soon if you can upload the subject
Bruce
On Mar 25, 2013, at 9:44 PM, Charles Malpas
wrote:
> Dear Freesurfer experts,
>
> I am having a strange problem with a single brain. Freesurfer is over
> estimating the pial surface by a great deal. Two thi
Looks like a topological defect sine there is not white surface their either,
is there?
On May 20, 2012, at 9:53 AM, octavian lie wrote:
>
>
> Dear All,
>
> I processed a MR brain after temporal lobe resection. While brainmask.mgz,
> and brain.mgz include the temporal remnant (correctly)
Dear All,
>
> I processed a MR brain after temporal lobe resection. While brainmask.mgz,
> and brain.mgz include the temporal remnant (correctly), the calculated pial
> surface excludes it (see attached). How, and at what step can I edit the
> image so that the pial surface (red line) is inclusive
It is difficult to tell from one slice and one view what is going on but
in general you can only get the pial boundary to extend more by extending
the wm boundary (but of course, only where there is actual wm). The pial
boundary grows out from the wm boundary so if the wm boundary is
incorrect,
