Hi,
Yes my original data has 1x1x1mm voxel dimension but I prefer to work with
the upsampled data. I am satisfied with the results I get from Freesurfer
and the results actually look better than the results I get with the 1mm
data, the only problem I have is that the thalamus mask does not keep the
sorry, I'm confused about what you are trying to do. Can you start from the
beginning and explain? If the data you have is 1mm but upsampled by
the scanner there is really nothing to be gained by processing the
upsampled data and it will waste lots of time
cheers
Bruce
On Mon, 25 Jul 2016,
D
Does this wiki page help?
http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/FsAnat-to-NativeAnat
On 07/25/2016 04:22 PM, Dorsa Haji Ghaffari wrote:
> Yes I created it using the higher resolution and I think it looks
> fine. I attached the aseg.mgz. Is there any way to create the thalamus
> mask with the
Hi Dorsa
did you create the aseg.mgz from 1mm data (using the standard "conform"
process), or higher res? The file you sent is higher:
mri_info resliceduncoregtahalmus.nii.gz
Volume information for resliceduncoregtahalmus.nii.gz
type: nii
dimensions: 512 x 512 x 288
voxel size
Hi Dorsa
you need to give us more details. What was your reslicing command line?
And the screen output?
Bruce
On Mon, 25 Jul 2016, Dorsa Haji Ghaffari wrote:
Hi,
I re-sliced my left thalamus so that the size and number of slices correspond
with the original MRI, but when I open it in free
