[Freeswitch-users] controlling calls handled within a fifo using event_socket

2009-12-09 Thread Luke Graybill
In my FreeSWITCH environment, calls are originated out to customers who are placed into a fifo upon answer. There are members (x-lite endpoints) in this fifo who handle those customer calls. I am writing a monitoring application that uses event_socket to watch the channels involved in this

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Asynchronous communication with FreeSWITCH's mod_event_socket

2008-09-19 Thread Luke Graybill
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 3:49 PM, Luke Graybill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My suggested solution is to apply the job-id concept from bgapi to messages as well, and to go a step further; borrow the Asterisk idea of transmitting an identifier along with each command. Every response and event

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Asynchronous communication with FreeSWITCH's mod_event_socket

2008-09-19 Thread Luke Graybill
Oops, I forgot to mention anthm as well - he provided great feedback on irc! On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 10:19 AM, Luke Graybill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 3:49 PM, Luke Graybill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My suggested solution is to apply the job-id concept from bgapi

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Asynchronous communication with FreeSWITCH's mod_event_socket

2008-09-19 Thread Luke Graybill
that doesn't confuse things - I'm not great on concise terminology. Killarny On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 10:45 AM, Michael Jerris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sep 19, 2008, at 12:19 PM, Luke Graybill wrote: On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 3:49 PM, Luke Graybill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My suggested solution

[Freeswitch-users] Asynchronous communication with FreeSWITCH's mod_event_socket

2008-09-18 Thread Luke Graybill
I've been doing a lot of work recently with FreeSWITCH's mod_event_socket, and I wanted to comment a bit about the syntax used for commands through the socket while using asynchronous mode. I haven't tried the synchronous mode yet, as I always want to be free to be able to execute commands without