of 300%), and yet the
audio still failed at the same number of listeners.
Brian.
From: Anthony Minessale [mailto:anthony.miness...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 3:49 PM
To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference scalability
We
-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference scalability
What exactly are you doing I know it goes better than that.. are you using
64bit?
/ b
On Dec 17, 2009, at 3:41 PM, Brian wrote:
I did a test with the trunk version for the one conference case
and everything else stays the same.
Brian.
From: Brian West [mailto:br...@freeswitch.org]
Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 5:20 PM
To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference scalability
What exactly are you doing I know it goes better than
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference scalability
We didn't post it anywhere but we just get overwhelmed with them and
many of them are unfounded and take up a lot of time to track down.
That does not mean you have not found a real problem but the first
step is trying trunk
%),
and yet the audio still failed at the same number of listeners.
Brian.
From: Anthony Minessale [mailto:anthony.miness...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 3:49 PM
To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference scalability
...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 3:49 PM
To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference scalability
We didn't post it anywhere but we just get overwhelmed
PM
To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference scalability
We didn't post it anywhere but we just get overwhelmed with
them and
many of them are unfounded
18, 2009 11:34 AM
To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference scalability
Conferencing is hardly the best place to judge performance.
Quality is a far more important goal to me in conferencing.
Lets compare who can do 48khz conferences with several
[mailto:anthony.miness...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, December 18, 2009 11:34 AM
To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference scalability
Conferencing is hardly the best place to judge performance.
Quality is a far more important goal to me in conferencing
Brian, there was not one insulting word in anything I have said and as this
is a community mailing list my replies are always voiced to address the
public in general not you specifically, like I already mentioned in my last
post.
If you open a public forum on a FAQ be prepared to hear our policy.
to see how
that scales...
Brian.
From: Michael Collins [mailto:m...@freeswitch.org]
Sent: Friday, December 18, 2009 2:33 PM
To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference scalability
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Brian br
, December 18, 2009 2:33 PM
*To:* freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
*Subject:* Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference scalability
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Brian br...@proximosystems.com wrote:
I was evaluating the technologies available, and I thought you would be
interested
[mailto:anthony.miness...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, December 18, 2009 11:34 AM
To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference scalability
Conferencing is hardly the best place to judge performance.
Quality is a far more important goal to me
: Friday, December 18, 2009 2:33 PM
To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference scalability
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Brian br...@proximosystems.com wrote:
I was evaluating the technologies available, and I thought you would be
interested in my
I would be curious what the same tests produce with svn trunk of FreeSWITCH.
Mike
On Dec 16, 2009, at 4:49 PM, Brian wrote:
Hi,
I’m new to FreeSWITCH and I’m testing the scalability of mod_conference to
see if it will scale better that other solutions. My scenario is to have one
, but I don't see what it could be.
Brian.
From: Michael Jerris [mailto:m...@jerris.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 10:18 AM
To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference scalability
I would be curious what the same tests produce with svn
If you're going to have that many listeners then it would be best to use
something like shoutcast to broadcast the stream out to a local stream on
various different boxes... then tie the callers into a stream... when they have
questions uuid_transfer them into the conf.. then back to the stream
that I’m doing wrong, but I don’t see what it could be.
Brian.
*From:* Michael Jerris [mailto:m...@jerris.com]
*Sent:* Thursday, December 17, 2009 10:18 AM
*To:* freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
*Subject:* Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference scalability
I would be curious
there is something on the FreeSWITCH side
that I’m doing wrong, but I don’t see what it could be.
Brian.
From: Michael Jerris [mailto:m...@jerris.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 10:18 AM
To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference
Yes, while it is true that does make a profound difference but if he has many
listeners and not very many talkers... just tapping into the conference and
streaming that audio out would scale well.
/b
On Dec 17, 2009, at 1:50 PM, Steve Underwood wrote:
I don't think you have mentioned which
,
Brian.
From: Anthony Minessale [mailto:anthony.miness...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 2:42 PM
To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference scalability
One man's stable release is another man's 6 month old release with hundreds
on.
Thanks,
Brian.
*From:* Anthony Minessale [mailto:anthony.miness...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Thursday, December 17, 2009 2:42 PM
*To:* freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
*Subject:* Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference scalability
One man's stable release is another man's 6 month old
To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference scalability
One man's stable release is another man's 6 month old release with
hundreds of known fixed bugs.
If one of the core developers tells you to try it, you may as well
take the time to try it now
What exactly are you doing I know it goes better than that.. are you using
64bit?
/ b
On Dec 17, 2009, at 3:41 PM, Brian wrote:
I did a test with the trunk version for the one conference case, and it is
the same results as for 1.0.4. The audio failed at around 300 listeners.
Oddly though,
on.
Thanks,
Brian.
*From:* Anthony Minessale [mailto:anthony.miness...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Thursday, December 17, 2009 2:42 PM
*To:* freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
*Subject:* Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference scalability
One man's stable release is another man's 6
Hi,
I'm new to FreeSWITCH and I'm testing the scalability of mod_conference to
see if it will scale better that other solutions. My scenario is to have one
speaker, and many listeners (mute). Since I have only one speaker, I was
expecting this to scale well because there is no audio mixing
26 matches
Mail list logo
