This looks very much like a winding-rule issue. Despite Adobe's font
documentation claiming that glyphs should be rendered with non-zero
winding, the Adobe *font* scalers/renderers actually use even-odd.
This can be seen in CPSI (if anyone has access to it), by drawing a
series of glyphs lik
Werner,
Would there be any significant differences between the hinting from a
ttfautohint built using Freetype 2.4.7 against one built using say 2.4.10 ?
thanks
-v
On 7 Aug 2012, at 21:24, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> ttfautohint 0.92 has been released.
__
> Would there be any significant differences between the hinting from
> a ttfautohint built using Freetype 2.4.7 against one built using say
> 2.4.10 ?
No, IIRC. The main reason to use newer releases of FreeType is to
avoid potential security issues, but this shouldn't be a problem for
`private'
Hi Suzuki,
You are right, it is not a regression. I mistakengly replied to an old
email.
IvanN
-Original Message-
From: suzuki toshiya [mailto:mpsuz...@hiroshima-u.ac.jp]
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 8:03 PM
To: inin...@pdftron.com
Cc: w...@gnu.org; freetype-devel@nongnu.org
Subject:
> This looks very much like a winding-rule issue.
Yes.
> Despite Adobe's font documentation claiming that glyphs should be
> rendered with non-zero winding, the Adobe *font* scalers/renderers
> actually use even-odd.
Interesting.
> If this looks like becoming more important, and no one else is
Hi all,
I'm sorry I've disturbed this ML with my unclear questions. I did
found out by myself how to have optimal font rendering. What I was
missing was vertical font hinting because I was freely translating the
y coordinate by fractional amount so that vertical hinting was
actually lost. I unders
