Re: t1 and afm

2023-02-03 Thread Alexei Podtelezhnikov
Werner, I got this. Ascender and Descender are optional and could either be omitted or even set to zero in AFM, e.g. in the current URW++ base 35 fonts. The fix is in. Alexei On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 12:35 PM Alexei Podtelezhnikov wrote: > Hi Werner, > > URW++ fonts are now distributed as t1 w

t1 and afm

2023-02-03 Thread Alexei Podtelezhnikov
Hi Werner,URW++ fonts are now distributed as t1 which is binary with an ASCII header. urw-base35-fonts/fonts at master · ArtifexSoftware/urw-base35-fontsgithub.comFreeType opens them just fine. There are also afm files. Do we need to attach them to t1? I tried but that messed up the ascender so it

Re: GSoC 2023

2023-02-03 Thread Behdad Esfahbod
I apologize. I forgot about ftbench. behdad http://behdad.org/ On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 9:22 AM Behdad Esfahbod wrote: > Hi Werner, > > One idea would be to develop a performance benchmarking suite of various > aspects of the library's functionality. I don't think FreeType currently > has one? >

Re: GSoC 2023

2023-02-03 Thread Behdad Esfahbod
Hi Werner, One idea would be to develop a performance benchmarking suite of various aspects of the library's functionality. I don't think FreeType currently has one? For ideas, you can look look at HarfBuzz's here (which also measure's FreeType): https://github.com/harfbuzz/harfbuzz/tree/main/