On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 20:08 +0200, Duncan Webb wrote:
> I think that we discuss this on the devel list, as IIRC dischi and jason
> did some analysis of xml parsers.
We've basically standardized on xml.sax as it had a good balance between
performance and memory consumption, and it's bundled with
> I think that we discuss this on the devel list, as IIRC dischi and jason
> did some analysis of xml parsers.
>
> In freevo-1, at the moment there are already several parsers:
> http://pyxml.sourceforge.net/
> elementtree and
> beautifulsoup.
>
> All have advantages and disadvantages. I ag
Gorka Olaizola wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 09:22:13AM +0200, Gorka Olaizola wrote:
>> It seems that python should use another implementation of XML at least
>> in the 1.8.x series.
>
> That should read Freevo. Freevo should use another implementation of
> XML at least in the 1.8.x series.
I
On Thu, April 3, 2008 4:59 pm, Jason Tackaberry wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 16:50 +0100, Adam Charrett wrote:
>> Did you get a chance to look at the updated patch yet? Do you need me to
>> resend it?
>
> I did see the updated patch. Sorry I haven't a chance to review/commit
> it yet. I gave it
On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 16:50 +0100, Adam Charrett wrote:
> Did you get a chance to look at the updated patch yet? Do you need me to
> resend it?
I did see the updated patch. Sorry I haven't a chance to review/commit
it yet. I gave it a quick once over earlier and it looked ok. Sorry
again for th
On Thu, March 27, 2008 2:21 pm, Adam Charrett wrote:
>
> Tell an lie I can recreate it here is the new (hopefully now correct)
> patch.
> I've tried to match the formatting in the files now as well.
>
> Cheers
>
> Adam
Hi Jason,
Did you get a chance to look at the updated patch yet? Do you need
