On 26/10/2008 18:18, Evan Hisey said the following:
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 5:36 PM, Evan Hisey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Duncan-
>> I am running 1.8.2 of freevo with a pvr150. When I try and use
>> freevo to watch TV I get the following trace back. The same setup was
>> working with 1.7.6.
On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 16:16 +0100, Hans Meine wrote:
> If my opinion counts, I like the old syntax better; I think "explicit is
> better than implicit" from the Zen holds here, because you just don't *see*
> that it's a property when you read "q.monitor = True". (From a language
> perspective,
On Montag 27 Oktober 2008, Jason Tackaberry wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 10:13 +0100, Dirk Meyer wrote:
> > I did not like monitoring(bool) and neither do I like monitor(bool). I
>
> I don't like monitoring(bool) either, but monitor(bool) seems fine. And
> if nobody is likely to want to disable
On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 10:13 +0100, Dirk Meyer wrote:
> I did not like monitoring(bool) and neither do I like monitor(bool). I
I don't like monitoring(bool) either, but monitor(bool) seems fine. And
if nobody is likely to want to disable monitoring, then
monitor(bool=True) seems better.
> don't
Jason Tackaberry wrote:
> Did you consider having a monitor(bool) method, and a readonly
> monitoring property that returns the current monitoring state?
I did not like monitoring(bool) and neither do I like monitor(bool). I
don't know, it feels better with monitor = bool. If using a functions is
