On Sonntag 16 September 2007, John Molohan wrote:
Justin Wetherell wrote:
I can see why this would be annoying to anyone that uses a dial-up
connection or an E-mail client from the early years (pine, etc).
It's not just those users. It's about keeping the text relevant and easy
to follow
I'm normally not too religious about this stuff (anymore) but at the
risk of sounding elitist, I must say that lately things are getting out
of hand, and emails are getting ridiculously formatted.
There is some sense to top-posting and not pruning any of the quoted
text, but there is no
Jason-
Yeah, sorry about that, I have gotten so used to getting giant
emails at work lately(no one trims _anything_ ever). Thanks for the
reminder.
Evan
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges.
I agree but E-mail clients today (mine being Gmail) pretty much hide
everything that is irrelevant. So it's not a conscience effort to keep the
previous content, I'd guess it's more like people not realizing that they
are actually including all text from a previous E-mail. I can see why this
would
On Sat, 2007-09-15 at 12:02 -0400, Justin Wetherell wrote:
I agree but E-mail clients today (mine being Gmail) pretty much hide
everything that is irrelevant.
I thought even with gmail when you reply to the email, it quotes (and
shows) the whole quoted email in the textarea?
On Sat, 2007-09-15 at 11:01 -0500, Evan Hisey wrote:
Yeah, sorry about that, I have gotten so used to getting giant
emails at work lately(no one trims _anything_ ever). Thanks for the
reminder.
Same where I work too. And there's actually some justification for
that, especially where it's
Justin Wetherell wrote:
I agree but E-mail clients today (mine being Gmail) pretty much hide
everything that is irrelevant. So it's not a conscience effort to keep
the previous content, I'd guess it's more like people not realizing
that they are actually including all text from a previous
