On Tue, 2006-10-10 at 20:51 +0200, Duncan Webb wrote:
> Thanks, it's real fun...
And it's your gateway drug to 2.0. :)
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get
Jason Tackaberry wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-10-10 at 19:02 +0200, Dirk Meyer wrote:
>> And we are glad you do this. Thanks again.
>
> Seconded. Thanks Duncan.
Thanks, it's real fun...
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Fu
On Tue, 2006-10-10 at 19:02 +0200, Dirk Meyer wrote:
> And we are glad you do this. Thanks again.
Seconded. Thanks Duncan.
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'
Duncan Webb wrote:
> IMHO The reason for 1.6 is to show that freevo is alive and kicking and
> to take some of the pressure of the developers of freevo2.
And we are glad you do this. Thanks again.
Dischi
--
Of course there's no reason for it, it's just our policy.
pgpcQ9LzBBl68.pgp
Descripti
It looks like the latest pygame still needs Numeric and smpeg. Unless
someone has a problem with it, I am going to see about updating the
source install dependency page for 1.5 to better reflect what is core
dep. for freevo and base plugins (between midterms). I am finding that
a lot of the library
Dirk Meyer wrote:
> Duncan Webb wrote:
>> Dirk Meyer wrote:
>>> Duncan Webb wrote:
Evan Hisey wrote:
> Duncan-
> In the 1.6 branch are we still keeping the Numeric dependency or are
> there plans to move to it's replacement NumPy? According to the
> Numeric website all work o
Duncan Webb wrote:
> Dirk Meyer wrote:
>> Duncan Webb wrote:
>>> Evan Hisey wrote:
Duncan-
In the 1.6 branch are we still keeping the Numeric dependency or are
there plans to move to it's replacement NumPy? According to the
Numeric website all work on Numeric has ceased. It lo
Dirk Meyer wrote:
> Duncan Webb wrote:
>> Evan Hisey wrote:
>>> Duncan-
>>> In the 1.6 branch are we still keeping the Numeric dependency or are
>>> there plans to move to it's replacement NumPy? According to the
>>> Numeric website all work on Numeric has ceased. It looks like they
>>> have prov
Evan Hisey wrote:
> Dischi-
>I am really looking forward to the 2.0 release.
>
> Duncan-
>Is there a 1.6 wiki page yet? Or does the 1.5 source install page
> just need to be update with the 1.6 information. I know there is
> already one new dep elementtree. SInce I am getting stuff ready t
"Evan Hisey" wrote:
> Dischi-
>I am really looking forward to the 2.0 release.
Me, too :)
I using svn right now, but two major things are still missing to get
the whole fun.
> Duncan-
>Is there a 1.6 wiki page yet? Or does the 1.5 source install page
> just need to be update with the 1.6
Dischi-
I am really looking forward to the 2.0 release.
Duncan-
Is there a 1.6 wiki page yet? Or does the 1.5 source install page
just need to be update with the 1.6 information. I know there is
already one new dep elementtree. SInce I am getting stuff ready to
package the 1.6 for Slackware
Update-
It looks like someone at Gentoo has made some compiler patches for
it. That looks like it will solve my problems.
Evan
On 10/9/06, Evan Hisey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Duncan,Dischi-
> On the subject of dead or dieing dependencies, What is smpeg used
> for? While it was a good pack
"Evan Hisey" wrote:
> Duncan,Dischi-
> On the subject of dead or dieing dependencies, What is smpeg used
> for? While it was a good package, it is starting to suffer bit rot and
> I do not know of anyone keeping it patched up. At the moment I am
> trying to track done an smpeg compile problem on
Duncan,Dischi-
On the subject of dead or dieing dependencies, What is smpeg used
for? While it was a good package, it is starting to suffer bit rot and
I do not know of anyone keeping it patched up. At the moment I am
trying to track done an smpeg compile problem on Slackware 11. Not
sure if it i
Duncan Webb wrote:
> Evan Hisey wrote:
>> Duncan-
>> In the 1.6 branch are we still keeping the Numeric dependency or are
>> there plans to move to it's replacement NumPy? According to the
>> Numeric website all work on Numeric has ceased. It looks like they
>> have provided a serach and replace
Evan Hisey wrote:
> Duncan-
> In the 1.6 branch are we still keeping the Numeric dependency or are
> there plans to move to it's replacement NumPy? According to the
> Numeric website all work on Numeric has ceased. It looks like they
> have provided a serach and replace module in numpy to convert
Duncan-
In the 1.6 branch are we still keeping the Numeric dependency or are
there plans to move to it's replacement NumPy? According to the
Numeric website all work on Numeric has ceased. It looks like they
have provided a serach and replace module in numpy to convert Numeric
code to NumPy.
Eva
17 matches
Mail list logo
