Dirk Meyer wrote:
> Duncan Webb wrote:
>> Jason Tackaberry wrote:
>>> On Sun, 2009-05-17 at 17:38 +0200, Duncan Webb wrote:
For some people the most important change is that Python-2.4 is no
longer supported whereas Python-2.6 is now supported.
>>> I wonder if this change alone warrants a
Duncan Webb wrote:
> Jason Tackaberry wrote:
>> On Sun, 2009-05-17 at 17:38 +0200, Duncan Webb wrote:
>>> For some people the most important change is that Python-2.4 is no
>>> longer supported whereas Python-2.6 is now supported.
>>
>> I wonder if this change alone warrants a version upgrade to 1
Duncan Webb wrote:
> Jason Tackaberry wrote:
>> On Sun, 2009-05-17 at 17:38 +0200, Duncan Webb wrote:
>>> For some people the most important change is that Python-2.4 is no
>>> longer supported whereas Python-2.6 is now supported.
>>
>> I wonder if this change alone warrants a version upgrade to 1
On Sun, 2009-05-17 at 18:57 +0200, Duncan Webb wrote:
> I forget that you don't look at the tracker very often. There are two
> open bugs for kaa. One for base and the other for metadata, will you get
> time to fix them?
>
> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2392037&group_id=46652&a
Jason Tackaberry wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-05-17 at 18:30 +0200, Duncan Webb wrote:
>> BTW this reminds me that we need some release of kaa.base, kaa.metadata
>> and kaa.display.
>>
>> Would it be possible to have these done by the 22nd so that testing can
>> be done against these packages?
>
> I'd li
Jason Tackaberry wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-05-17 at 18:30 +0200, Duncan Webb wrote:
>> BTW this reminds me that we need some release of kaa.base, kaa.metadata
>> and kaa.display.
>>
>> Would it be possible to have these done by the 22nd so that testing can
>> be done against these packages?
>
> I'd li
On Sun, 2009-05-17 at 18:38 +0200, Duncan Webb wrote:
> Didn't dischi send a mail out about dropping support for Python-2.4 in
> kaa.base and IIRC nobody really objected? May be it is time to make the
> jump ;-)
Yeah, but it's possible the types of people that frequent the mailing
lists are more l
Jason Tackaberry wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-05-17 at 18:21 +0200, Duncan Webb wrote:
>> Good point, not sure what our strategy is over Python versions. 1.5.4
>> added support for Python-2.4 and 1.3.3 added support for Python-2.3 so
>> it would seem not that important.
>
> I don't see a problem with _ad
On Sun, 2009-05-17 at 18:30 +0200, Duncan Webb wrote:
> BTW this reminds me that we need some release of kaa.base, kaa.metadata
> and kaa.display.
>
> Would it be possible to have these done by the 22nd so that testing can
> be done against these packages?
I'd like to decommission the old kaa.Pro
Jason Tackaberry wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-05-17 at 17:38 +0200, Duncan Webb wrote:
>> For some people the most important change is that Python-2.4 is no
>> longer supported whereas Python-2.6 is now supported.
>
> I wonder if this change alone warrants a version upgrade to 1.9.0?
BTW this reminds me
On Sun, 2009-05-17 at 12:29 -0400, Jason Tackaberry wrote:
> I don't see a problem with _adding_ support during minor revs, but
> removing support during a minor rev seems contrary to what most people
> would expect.
Sorry, s/minor/bugfix/
On Sun, 2009-05-17 at 18:21 +0200, Duncan Webb wrote:
> Good point, not sure what our strategy is over Python versions. 1.5.4
> added support for Python-2.4 and 1.3.3 added support for Python-2.3 so
> it would seem not that important.
I don't see a problem with _adding_ support during minor revs,
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Duncan Webb wrote:
> Jason Tackaberry wrote:
>> On Sun, 2009-05-17 at 17:38 +0200, Duncan Webb wrote:
>>> For some people the most important change is that Python-2.4 is no
>>> longer supported whereas Python-2.6 is now supported.
>>
>> I wonder if this change alo
Jason Tackaberry wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-05-17 at 17:38 +0200, Duncan Webb wrote:
>> For some people the most important change is that Python-2.4 is no
>> longer supported whereas Python-2.6 is now supported.
>
> I wonder if this change alone warrants a version upgrade to 1.9.0?
>
> There's an expe
On Sun, 2009-05-17 at 17:38 +0200, Duncan Webb wrote:
> For some people the most important change is that Python-2.4 is no
> longer supported whereas Python-2.6 is now supported.
I wonder if this change alone warrants a version upgrade to 1.9.0?
There's an expectation that minor version bumps won
Hello all Freevoers,
Rather than forget or run out of time to do this announcement on the
release day of freevo-1.8.4, planned for 26 May 2009, I will do the
announcement now so that you know what is coming up.
IMPORTANT
=
Most of the translations will need an update as some of the chang
16 matches
Mail list logo
