On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 11:26 +0100, Adam Charrett wrote:
> Only 1 thing, I think the test app (test/shaped.py) was missed off the
> check, might be useful to check in as it shows the usage of the API.
Indeed. I forgot to svn add it. :)
(It's in now.)
---
On Thu, April 24, 2008 6:02 pm, Jason Tackaberry wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 15:50 +0100, Adam Charrett wrote:
>> Damn webmail, I was sure I clicked add, oh well here it is (hopefully)
>
> Thanks Adam. I've committed the patch. Sorry about the delay.
>
> Cheers,
> Jason.
>
Thanks Jason,
Only
On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 15:50 +0100, Adam Charrett wrote:
> Damn webmail, I was sure I clicked add, oh well here it is (hopefully)
Thanks Adam. I've committed the patch. Sorry about the delay.
Cheers,
Jason.
-
This SF.net e
On Thu, April 24, 2008 3:16 pm, Jason Tackaberry wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 15:02 +0100, Adam Charrett wrote:
>> In the process I though I would check the patch that I submitted a while
>> ago and realised there was a problem with it, so here is the proper
>> patch
>> (at last).
>
> Missing att
On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 15:02 +0100, Adam Charrett wrote:
> In the process I though I would check the patch that I submitted a while
> ago and realised there was a problem with it, so here is the proper patch
> (at last).
Missing attachment. :)
On Thu, April 3, 2008 5:02 pm, Adam Charrett wrote:
> On Thu, April 3, 2008 4:59 pm, Jason Tackaberry wrote:
>> On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 16:50 +0100, Adam Charrett wrote:
>>> Did you get a chance to look at the updated patch yet? Do you need me
>>> to
>>> resend it?
>>
>> I did see the updated patch.
On Thu, April 3, 2008 4:59 pm, Jason Tackaberry wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 16:50 +0100, Adam Charrett wrote:
>> Did you get a chance to look at the updated patch yet? Do you need me to
>> resend it?
>
> I did see the updated patch. Sorry I haven't a chance to review/commit
> it yet. I gave it
On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 16:50 +0100, Adam Charrett wrote:
> Did you get a chance to look at the updated patch yet? Do you need me to
> resend it?
I did see the updated patch. Sorry I haven't a chance to review/commit
it yet. I gave it a quick once over earlier and it looked ok. Sorry
again for th
On Thu, March 27, 2008 2:21 pm, Adam Charrett wrote:
>
> Tell an lie I can recreate it here is the new (hopefully now correct)
> patch.
> I've tried to match the formatting in the files now as well.
>
> Cheers
>
> Adam
Hi Jason,
Did you get a chance to look at the updated patch yet? Do you need
On Thu, March 27, 2008 12:35 pm, Adam Charrett wrote:
> On Thu, March 27, 2008 12:13 pm, Jason Tackaberry wrote:
>> On Thu, 2008-03-27 at 08:21 +, Adam Charrett wrote:
>>> This patch adds several new methods to X11Window which adds the ability
>>> to set the shape mask for the window (either fr
On Thu, March 27, 2008 12:13 pm, Jason Tackaberry wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-03-27 at 08:21 +, Adam Charrett wrote:
>> This patch adds several new methods to X11Window which adds the ability
>> to set the shape mask for the window (either from a bitmask string or an
>> imlib2 image) and disable/enab
On Thu, 2008-03-27 at 08:21 +, Adam Charrett wrote:
> This patch adds several new methods to X11Window which adds the ability
> to set the shape mask for the window (either from a bitmask string or an
> imlib2 image) and disable/enable windows decorations. I've also included
> a test app that s
This patch adds several new methods to X11Window which adds the ability
to set the shape mask for the window (either from a bitmask string or an
imlib2 image) and disable/enable windows decorations. I've also included
a test app that shows the new features in use.
Cheers
Adam
Index: display/src/x
13 matches
Mail list logo
