Evan Hisey wrote:
> Marcus-
>While it is a nice idea, it is not really a feasible for the same
> reasons a Windows port is not. Freevo use some very Linux idioms. It
> might be possible to get a fink-ified version of freevo running on a
> Mac, but do not believe that a full port would really be
Dirk Meyer wrote:
> A windows port is much more complicated, MacOS X is a Posix system,
> just like Linux. So most of the windows problems do not apply here.
I agree that an OS X port would be a lot more straightforward than
Windows, but I don't think it is the best use of a SoC applicant.
--
"Evan Hisey" wrote:
> Marcus-
>While it is a nice idea, it is not really a feasible for the same
> reasons a Windows port is not. Freevo use some very Linux idioms.
A windows port is much more complicated, MacOS X is a Posix system,
just like Linux. So most of the windows problems do not appl
Marcus-
While it is a nice idea, it is not really a feasible for the same
reasons a Windows port is not. Freevo use some very Linux idioms. It
might be possible to get a fink-ified version of freevo running on a
Mac, but do not believe that a full port would really be worth the
effort. Just a fe
Hi,
seeing that freevo got accepted for SoC, a project that I would be
interested in doing would be creating a "true" version for Mac OS X,
i.e. an .app-bundle that contains all libraries and support files, so
that users can do a drag & drop installation.
An nice extension of this would be the in
