- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
From: Hans Meine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Thursday 19 October 2006 18:33, Hans Meine wrote:
> > Hi Duncan,
> >
> > then let me tell you my opinion.
>
> Maybe I should not have written this, causing so much misunderstanding, I
just
> had to tell you about my grie
On Thursday 19 October 2006 18:33, Hans Meine wrote:
> Hi Duncan,
>
> then let me tell you my opinion.
Maybe I should not have written this, causing so much misunderstanding, I just
had to tell you about my grieves with the SF tracker. Of course, I agree
that if Duncan wants to use the tracker
"TC Wan" wrote:
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
> Dischi wrote:
>>> > On Fri, 2006-10-20 at 16:49 +0200, Richard van Paasen wrote:
>> So I'd vote for the tracker. Maybe in a reconfigured form.
>>> >
>>> > I'd be thrilled to see a bugzilla install for freevo. dischi, can we
>>> > set this up on the same se
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dischi wrote:
>> > On Fri, 2006-10-20 at 16:49 +0200, Richard van Paasen wrote:
>>> >> So I'd vote for the tracker. Maybe in a reconfigured form.
>> >
>> > I'd be thrilled to see a bugzilla install for freevo. dischi, can we
>> > set this up on the
Jason Tackaberry wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-10-20 at 16:49 +0200, Richard van Paasen wrote:
>> So I'd vote for the tracker. Maybe in a reconfigured form.
>
> I'd be thrilled to see a bugzilla install for freevo. dischi, can we
> set this up on the same server that svn is on? I could do the
> installat
On Fri, 2006-10-20 at 16:49 +0200, Richard van Paasen wrote:
> So I'd vote for the tracker. Maybe in a reconfigured form.
I'd be thrilled to see a bugzilla install for freevo. dischi, can we
set this up on the same server that svn is on? I could do the
installation.
---
- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
From: Hans Meine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I feel the need to support Duncan in this decison. Apart from that the
sourceforge tracker is one of the worst change management tools that I have
seen, it certainly fulfills a needs of developers:
- Descriptions and attached
Jason Tackaberry wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-10-19 at 18:33 +0200, Hans Meine wrote:
>> Reading the mails from the tracker takes simply too much time compared to
>> the
>> others, that's why I now skip most of them. I very much prefer simple,
>> short
>> mails with proper quoting (no full-quote, top
I agree. Although the Wiki page explained differently (before the Oct
18 amendment), asking developers to send it to freevo-devel with
[PATCH] in subject line (like mplayer devel). Now that the Wiki has
proper description, there won't be mistakes. I did send an email
previously instead of using tra
On Thu, 2006-10-19 at 18:33 +0200, Hans Meine wrote:
> Reading the mails from the tracker takes simply too much time compared to the
> others, that's why I now skip most of them. I very much prefer simple, short
> mails with proper quoting (no full-quote, top-posting ones).
For myself, I also p
Hi Duncan,
then let me tell you my opinion.
On Thursday, 19. October 2006 12:02, Duncan Webb wrote:
> 1) It's open to everybody, people can read what changes have been done
> without having to me a member of a freevo list.
That's no real argument, since that's what mailing list archives are for.
Hi all,
I would like to explain again
Why I would like you to use the tracker.
1) It's open to everybody, people can read what changes have been done
without having to me a member of a freevo list.
2) It's reliable, once you have posted a patch there you know that it
available for everybody.
3) T
12 matches
Mail list logo
