Like anything in the mainstream press, tantalisingly short on
detail. I argued back in 1996 that Economics needs to take on an
evolutionary outlook in a paper that was ultimately published in
2000. Indeed, I used the same Mashallian quote mentioned in the article:
Standish, R.K. (2000) ``The Role
That's strange, in my Mozilla Thunderbird (IMAP) e-Mail client
I can see the response from Russel before the original mail from
Nick about "Friam Digest, Vol 37, Issue 47". Microsoft's Outlook
displays it in the correct order:
Dates in Outlook
Russel's Mail Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 9:09
Nick's Mail
Title: Message
complexity group / chaos
club
meeting time: 7 pm Thursday July
27
meeting place: Mike Oliker's (directions
below)
meeting topic: the article "Antichaos and Adaptation"
by Stuart Kauffman. The article is
available
online at www.covchap.com/articles/
I think it's simply that Russel has his computer date wrong (one day early),
and while Outlook uses the local arrival time, Thunderbird uses the remote
sender's time.
Of course it's pretty absurd that in 2006 we still don't have computers on
networks naturally synchronized time-wise by default. A
Yes, you are right. If I sort after the remote sender's time, Outlook
shows the wrong message order, too.
-J.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Bill Eldridge
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 12:01 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity C
I do autosyncronise my computers clock with NTP. Where it all goes
pear shaped is that I send mail from Linux running on VMWare running
on top of Windows. Everytime windows hibernates, VMWare's clock gets
screwed up.
I have a menu item that connects to NTP and syncronise's Linux's
clock, but that
I know economics uses game theory, but I'm not sure whether
evolutionary game theory has caught on. This came up in a thread on
wedtech, so I thought I'd pass it along:
> I'm reading this:
> Game Theory Evolving by Herbert Gintis
> http://tinyurl.com/z22cj
> I like it because it loo
here" AND "in the head" of the observer.
>
> No, I hadn't heard of them, but the basic reasoning you mention sounds
> familiar.
>
> Cheers
>
> --
> *PS: A number of people ask me about the attachment to my email, which
> is of type "applicati
t;>
> Tolman,
>
>>> the inventor of cognitive behaviorism, and ultimately a traitor to the
>>> cause in my opinion.
>>>
>>> The basic idea is that reality can be cut in various ways and different
>>> observers SEE different cuts. All cuts are REAL p
Dear Miss Manners,
I need some help with posting to a favorite list of mine, friam.
should I always delete all of the history of what I am applying to when I
reply to a message on Friam.?
Otherwise things start to get lost in an ever more complicated see of
citations and references and <<
...or whether anything begins or ends, in contrast to events just being
a continuous dynamically variable stream of flows?
It's sort of the same question as in evolution, whether there are
species that resist selective pressures and occasionally change by some
other process, or just complex for
11 matches
Mail list logo
