Glen,
Gee, I don't know if it helps with your philosophy, but I think you're
making a common mistake with the inverse square relation. It's an
indicator of complex system organization, not a design principle. 'A'
implies 'B' but 'B' in no way implies 'A'. It's like a thermometer, if
a thermome
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marcus G. Daniels wrote:
> Sorry, no matter how you want to look at it the libertarian is going to
> lose..
I have no idea what you're implying, here. If your intention was to be
pithy, then you failed and the result is a simple non sequitur.
- --
Glen E. P. Ropella wrote:
> The problem with that upbringing is that the more of these regulations
> we make more universal (increase the extent of a control structure), the
> less agile we'll be when the environment changes (e.g. climate change
> forcing evacuation of coastal cities or the collaps
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have an ongoing cognitive conflict w.r.t. the principles I infer from
complexity theory and my ethical indoctrination/rearing. Perhaps some
of you wise ones can throw some words at the conflict to help me sort it
out.
The primary principle I've in
A bit off topic, but cute.
http://shaenon.livejournal.com/48834.html
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
Jim Hayes
Albuquerque, NM
TITLE: Hedging Complex and Chaotic Private Health Insurance Markets and the
Uninsured
TIME: Wednesday, September 5, 12:30p
LOCATION: Redfish Conference Room, 624 Agua Fria Street, Santa Fe NM
Lunch will be available for $5 purchase
ABSTRACT: Jim was seduced by
