Marcus G. Daniels wrote at 05/02/2013 10:38 AM:
> I don't agree, I think it's just because people don't think about the
> consequences of their own actions.
I definitely agree with that.
> They want some parental type person looking out for them in some vague
> general sense (the white hat engine
On 5/2/13 11:25 AM, glen e. p. ropella wrote:
I think you answer your own questions, right? The reason for people's
(false) expectations regarding computers like set top boxes or webcams
is _because_ of your latter argument.
I don't agree, I think it's just because people don't think about the
I think you answer your own questions, right? The reason for people's
(false) expectations regarding computers like set top boxes or webcams
is _because_ of your latter argument. If the goal is a "clear security
model", then when I install a webcam on my TV, I expect a clear security
model, not
Steve Smith wrote at 05/01/2013 06:00 PM:
> This seems like another form of tragedy around the commons?
I view all this the same way I view laws and selective enforcement by
DAs and LEOs. Laws are there to provide options for the LEOs to
selectively choose who to "suppress". (As with our disagre
Owen Densmore wrote at 05/01/2013 08:45 PM:
>>From twitter: Anyone have a better word/phrase for API -- Application
> Programming Interface? Nick, this should be great for the Village
> Pragmatist.
I like "control surface":
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Audio_control_surface
https://en.wikipedi
