Thanks for the Geographical correction.
What’s it like to see the sun at the Zenith more or less every day.
Occasionally we get the moon at the zenith and it makes the world seem perfect.
N
Nicholas Thompson
Emeritus Professor of Ethology and Psychology
Clark University
Cardinal? The only cardinal I know has red feathers and a conical beak made
for cracking seeds. And by the way, it's Ecuador, not Peru. In any case, in
honor of Cardinal Standish, and as someone who lives two miles south of the
equator, I will break out in song: "I come from the land down... er...
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 12:34:06PM -0700, thompnicks...@gmail.com wrote:
> Dear Friammers,
>
>
>
> The Conclave is on schedule. Still negotiating to get Cardinals Standish and
> Schiltz in from Australia and Peru (?) respectively. We will, of course, have
> to elect a new FRIAM pope before
Dear Friammers,
The Conclave is on schedule. Still negotiating to get Cardinals Standish and
Schiltz in from Australia and Peru (?) respectively. We will, of course, have
to elect a new FRIAM pope before we disband on Saturday.Which color smoke
do we put up George’s chimney? I
Super, Jon
George Duncan
Emeritus Professor of Statistics, Carnegie Mellon University
georgeduncanart.com
See posts on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram
Land: (505) 983-6895
Mobile: (505) 469-4671
My art theme: Dynamic exposition of the tension between matrix order and
luminous chaos.
"Attempt
I’m a sucker for science shows about dogs. My wife was watching one last
night and I stepped-in to see a part of it. The observation was that
intensive breeding for or against sociality can occur with foxes within a few
generations, like it has for dogs, and probably other animals too.
Damn! I need that T-Shirt for my campaigning!
*/"a 3D foam of camouflaged steel traps waiting to lop off the fractal
tendrils of our squidlike Leviathans"
/*
*/
/*
> On 2/13/20 8:13 AM, Marcus Daniels wrote:
>> I do wonder about Warren, Klobuchar, Sanders, and Buttigieg and their
>> rhetoric
Sarah and I will be there. I am looking
forward to meeting some of you in person.
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe
I don’t think of Bloomberg as being disguised, though. He’s a Romney-like
option. At this point, I’m less concerned about enabling Thiel-type people
than I am about enabling frothing morons. At least Nixon cared enough about
true and false to adapt his lies around facts, rather than to
I'll rank this way:
1. Bloomberg
2. Buttigieg
3. Klobuchar
George Duncan
Emeritus Professor of Statistics, Carnegie Mellon University
georgeduncanart.com
See posts on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram
Land: (505) 983-6895
Mobile: (505) 469-4671
My art theme: Dynamic exposition of the tension
Heh, good game, ranking as enablers. From most enabling to least, I'd go with:
1) Buttigieg
2) Klobuchar
3) Warren
4) Sanders
(3) and (4) are really a toss-up. Sanders seems light on specifics and long on
rants. And the devil is always in the detail. So Warren might be less enabling
than
Glen writes:
< Is being reasonable the right thing? >
I do wonder about Warren, Klobuchar, Sanders, and Buttigieg and their rhetoric
trying to pin blame on the divider-in-chief rather than on those that voted for
him. It seems like crypto-partisanism to me. They have to be different
... being reasonable is a bad thing?
Nick's entreatment here [1], this article [2], Dave's assurances here [3], rule
#5 here [4], the hidden spoiler effect criticism of ranked-choice voting [5],
counterintuitive irrationality from appeals to rationality like [6], [7] and
[8], etc.
Appeals to
13 matches
Mail list logo
