percent of all dairy cows have one of two bulls in their
>>>>> ancestry, there are one or two tomato hybrids, one or two strains of
>>>>> rice, wheat, corn, etc.
>>>>>
>>>>> This creates a huge vulnerability — a novel pest or disease and pre
On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 11:41 AM wrote:
>
>
> Of COURSE it would be you who would recognize “Red, Right, Returning”.
>
>
>
> I am surprised that some conservative magazine hasn’t adopted it as its
> motto.
>
Might be a better motto for the centrists to keep Left of the Red markers.
ie keep navig
should be incorporated into that which is deemed "Science" —
ergo there is no argument to lose.
If there is an argument — and there is clearly a difference of opinion
— it centers on the the issue of why Hermetic Alchemy, Acid
Epistemology, Anthropological Thick Description, Ayurvedic
d Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] basis for prediction — forked from the tail end of
anthropological observtions
I've watched people leave red to port on their returns, and some even get away
with it.
-- rec --
On Sun, Apr 19, 2020, 12:09 PM Nicholas Thompson
Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2020 10:17 AM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] basis for prediction — forked from the tail end of
anthropological observtions
I've watched people leave red to port on their returns, and some even get away
with it.
--
Nick -
>
> The thunder lightening thing is both apt and strange, because of
> course nothing is possible between lightning and thunder EXCEPT that
> it is going to thunder. CF living in SFO or Seattle. You've seen the
> lightening, folks! "One banana, two bananas.three bananas
> ….." Y
Now imagine that there are multiple species of investigation, thinking,
>> knowledge.
>>
>> Since the Age of Enlightenment, the western world has been hell bent on
>> hybridizing but one of them — Formalism (aka, roughly, Science).
>>
>> Yes, I believe that
in culinary creations.
>
> davew
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 18, 2020, at 8:58 PM, thompnicks...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
> Dave,
>
> No, wait a minute! Thou slenderest me! For you, Science is a bunch
> of nasty people with vested interests. Science, on that understanding,
> has
means with some kind of criteria for falsifiability and repeatability
>>>> THEN they should be incorporated into that which is deemed "Science" —
>>>> ergo there is no argument to lose.
>>>>
>>>> If there is an argument — and there is clearly
the sort of thing that can exclude. If pot smoking in bubble
baths leads to understandings that endure the test of time, then it is
a scientific method. Something like that seemed to have worked for
Archimedes.
Nick
Nicholas Thompson
Emeritus Professor of Ethology and Psychology
Clark Univ
> Nick
> >
> > Nicholas Thompson
> > Emeritus Professor of Ethology and Psychology
> > Clark University
> > thompnicks...@gmail.com
> > https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/
> >
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > F
ing that can exclude. If pot smoking in bubble
>> baths leads to understandings that endure the test of time, then it is
>> a scientific method. Something like that seemed to have worked for
>> Archimedes.
>>
>> Nick
>>
>> Nicholas Thompson
>
t: Saturday, April 18, 2020 6:31 PM
> To: friam@redfish.com
> Subject: Re: [FRIAM] basis for prediction — forked from the tail end of
> anthropological observtions
>
> Nick,
>
> I won't lose the argument, because I pre-believe that, IF alternative
> means with some kin
Tip the scales, Florida!
https://www.newsweek.com/florida-beaches-florida-moron-twitter-1498750
https://twitter.com/search?q=%23FloridaMorons&src=typed_query
On 4/18/20, 4:07 PM, "Friam on behalf of Prof David West"
wrote:
Consider three entities making 2016 political predictions and thei
hology Clark University
> thompnicks...@gmail.com https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/
>
>
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: Friam On Behalf Of Prof David West
> Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2020 5:07 PM
> To: friam@redfish.com
> Subject: [FRIAM] bas
> Clark University
> thompnicks...@gmail.com
> https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/
>
>
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: Friam On Behalf Of Prof David West
> Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2020 5:07 PM
> To: friam@redfish.com
> Subject: [FRIAM] basis for predi
ent: Saturday, April 18, 2020 5:07 PM
To: friam@redfish.com
Subject: [FRIAM] basis for prediction — forked from the tail end of
anthropological observtions
Consider three entities making 2016 political predictions and their predictions.
1- "cognoscenti" those citing poll data, Nate Silver
Dave writes:
"Scott Adams used none of those methods/tools but, as described in his book —
Win Bigly — the language and rhetoric analysis tools/techniques he did use."
If that is the world people want, maybe the world just needs to go ahead and
burn. Take off the masks, go back to work. Pump
Consider three entities making 2016 political predictions and their predictions.
1- "cognoscenti" those citing poll data, Nate Silver (albeit as everyone notes,
the citation was more interpretation than citation), pundits, et. al. — Trump,
at various times, has 1/1000 to 1/3 chance of winning th
19 matches
Mail list logo
