Yes, Eric, good points to modify the claim,
It returns the discussion to the acts one does or does not want to commit,
rather than to defense of an icon-group against an enemy-group that both, at
this stage, have been bleached of much of the complexity of real people and are
more cartoon than
net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/>
http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/
From: Friam [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf Of Steven A Smith
Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2017 9:56 AM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <friam@redfish.com>
Subject: Re: [FRIA
Eric -
I appreciate your point here. I think the problem in *all* of our
"culture wars" is not that one side is evil and the other must fight and
defeat them, but that there is a schism in "Ways of Knowing" which,
while unresolved, will lead to a schism in "Knowing" itself.
I was raised
orning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <friam@redfish.com>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] [SPAM] Re: [[Narcissism Again]again]
"2. But I read Nick as saying that The Problem, and the central accomplishment
of the Right, has been to install this shift in position as a feature of the
population.
"2. But I read Nick as saying that The Problem, and the central
accomplishment of the Right, has been to install this shift in position as
a feature of the population That is what worries me, and drives a
sense of urgency to fix a problem I do not know how to fix because I don’t
understand
, January 27, 2017 9:29 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <friam@redfish.com>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] [SPAM] Re: [[Narcissism Again]again]
Thank you for forwarding this Owen,
I didn’t receive the original.
> So. Let me just share one thought. I have said a hundred tim
Thank you for forwarding this Owen,
I didn’t receive the original.
> So. Let me just share one thought. I have said a hundred times that I think
> the great achievement of the Right in my life time has been to problematize
> (Ugh!) the Deweyan consensus of the 1950’s One of the elements of
