I have enough "Trumpian" friends to know that without exception they
have tried to frame this response as an attempt to undermine "the
peaceful transition of power".
I throw two things squarely in their face:
1. Donald said he would accept the outcome of the election ONLY if he
won. This i
Same in LA. Lots of both women and men.
On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 3:14 PM Marcus Daniels wrote:
> *Jochen wrote:*
>
>
>
> *“*On CNN I saw mainly women.”
>
>
>
> Even in the sleepy little town of Santa Fe, the streets were packed with
> demonstrators. Of course, women of many ethnicities -- some o
Jochen wrote:
“On CNN I saw mainly women.”
Even in the sleepy little town of Santa Fe, the streets were packed with
demonstrators. Of course, women of many ethnicities -- some of them were
infirm and shouldn’t have been out in the wind and snow. Lots of men, young
adults, and children too.
e Turkey and all the *-stan
>> countries such as Turkmenistan or Kazakhstan it will not end well.
>>
>> -J
>>
>>
>> Original message
>> From: Steven A Smith
>> Date: 1/21/17 21:53 (GMT+01:00)
>> To: The Friday Morning Appl
ly. I hope this was
not the last protest march. But will Donald listen? Doubtful.
-J.
Original message From: Pamela McCorduck
Date: 1/22/17 01:22 (GMT+01:00) To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity
Coffee Group Subject: Re: [FRIAM] And so it begins: the
dark times
an
> countries such as Turkmenistan or Kazakhstan it will not end well.
>
> -J
>
>
> Original message
> From: Steven A Smith
> Date: 1/21/17 21:53 (GMT+01:00)
> To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
> Subject: Re: [FRIAM] And
tries such as Turkmenistan or Kazakhstan it will not end well.
-J
Original message From: Steven A Smith Date:
1/21/17 21:53 (GMT+01:00) To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee
Group Subject: Re: [FRIAM] And so it begins: the dark times
Jochen, et al -
I ha
Jochen, et al -
I have to say I accept or agree with the idea of a sitting President (or
any high official) having close access to their most trusted advisors,
whether they are family or friends. It is only natural IMO and in
principle will allow them to do a better job. I understand the
ant
Jochen, et al -
I have to say I accept or agree with the idea of a sitting President (or
any high official) having close access to their most trusted advisors,
whether they are family or friends. It is only natural IMO and in
principle will allow them to do a better job. I understand the
ant
; -J.
>
>
>
> Original message
> From: Eric Charles
> Date: 1/21/17 17:23 (GMT+01:00)
> To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
>
> Subject: Re: [FRIAM] And so it begins: the dark times
>
> Actually Jochen, this one is squarely on t
t disliked candidate by the
population at large and also the candidate most disliked within his own party
won the election.
-J.
Original message From: Eric Charles
Date: 1/21/17 17:23 (GMT+01:00) To: The
Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group Subject: Re:
[FRIAM] And so
Actually Jochen, this one is squarely on the Clintons. When Bill appointed
Hillary to a White House task force back in the early 1990s, this went
through the court system. The judges in that case ruled that the law
applied to Cabinet appointments and paid positions within the larger
government, but
First it was not clear what *-ism mix it will be - authoritarianism, nepotism,
cronyism, nationalism or a mixture of it. Sarah Kendzior and Paul Krugman
predict we will end up in an authoritarian dictatorship. What do you think,
which *-ism will it be?
Maybe you could say the new minority presid
13 matches
Mail list logo