Re: [FRIAM] Friam Digest, Vol 61, Issue 16

ing Applied Complexity Coffee Group Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 12:30 PM Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Friam Digest, Vol 61, Issue 16 Nicholas Thompson wrote: > So, either the self is material, > > Or, "in" is understood in some way other than that it occupies a > containe

Re: [FRIAM] Friam Digest, Vol 61, Issue 16

I you are interested in models of the self, this could be for you: Metzinger, T. Being No One. The Self-Model Theory of Subjectivity. MIT Press, 2003 Cheers, Günther -- Günther Greindl Department of Philosophy of Science University of Vienna [EMAIL PROTECTED] Blog: http://www.complexitystudi

Re: [FRIAM] Friam Digest, Vol 61, Issue 16

Nicholas Thompson wrote: > So, either the self is material, > > Or, "in" is understood in some way other than that it occupies a > container. Yes, by "inner self", I was talking about Mikhail's latter "me". Mikhail Gorelkin wrote: > [second me] is the product of thinking of the first one (me as

Re: [FRIAM] Friam Digest, Vol 61, Issue 16

Glen, Here I am, going on vacation, and you serve me up this marvelous opportunity to spurn my packing and go on a behaviorist rant. OUCH! Unfair tactic. Instead, let me just try to connect this discussion to the tussle Robert and I are having. I would say that the following passage conta