Re: [FRIAM] GridPaths, Knuth's nifty book a Question

2008-08-24 Thread Phil Henshaw
us from falling in some great big hole. Phil From: Ken Lloyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 22, 2008 10:53 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group' Subject: RE: [FRIAM] GridPaths, Knuth's nifty book a Question And eventually you

Re: [FRIAM] GridPaths, Knuth's nifty book a Question

2008-08-22 Thread Phil Henshaw
, Knuth's nifty book a Question Not quite: I'm saying that you don't need to calculate the probability of ANY of the paths because the constraints of your problem mean that the probabilities (whatever they are are) of all the paths (however many of them there are) MUST sum to one (because

Re: [FRIAM] GridPaths, Knuth's nifty book a Question

2008-08-22 Thread Ken Lloyd
:19 AM To: 'The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group' Subject: Re: [FRIAM] GridPaths, Knuth's nifty book a Question That sounds like you're saying that having an ability to predict an outcome with certainty, a 'final cause' in that sense, means that discovering the path the system

Re: [FRIAM] GridPaths, Knuth's nifty book a Question

2008-08-22 Thread Owen Densmore
On Aug 21, 2008, at 6:59 PM, Robert Holmes wrote: .. Here's another (famous) problem that can be answered using a top-down technique rather than a bottom-up: if you have a regular 8x8 chess board and you remove the bottom left and top right squares, how many ways can you cover the

Re: [FRIAM] GridPaths, Knuth's nifty book a Question

2008-08-21 Thread Owen Densmore
On Aug 19, 2008, at 9:47 PM, Robert Holmes wrote: I'll take a top-down approach instead of Roger's bottom-up approach... I'm guessing that the problem has a bunch of constraints that you've not specified in your email (can't double-back, path can't crossover) and--most importantly--you

Re: [FRIAM] GridPaths, Knuth's nifty book a Question

2008-08-21 Thread Robert Holmes
Not quite: I'm saying that you don't need to calculate the probability of ANY of the paths because the constraints of your problem mean that the probabilities (whatever they are are) of all the paths (however many of them there are) MUST sum to one (because in your problem definition the path

Re: [FRIAM] GridPaths, Knuth's nifty book a Question

2008-08-19 Thread Owen Densmore
Very nice indeed, thanks! -- Owen On Aug 18, 2008, at 2:19 PM, Roger Critchlow wrote: On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 11:19 AM, Owen Densmore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1 - The probability for each path is calculated by looking at the possible choices at each point in the path. If you see a

[FRIAM] GridPaths, Knuth's nifty book a Question

2008-08-18 Thread Owen Densmore
Lately I've been puzzling on the intersection between computing/ algorithms and mathematics. This lead me to look at: Donald Knuth's Selected Papers on Computer Science http://tinyurl.com/5zraag In it he has several great essays, one of which is: Mathematics and Computer Science:

Re: [FRIAM] GridPaths, Knuth's nifty book a Question

2008-08-18 Thread Roger Critchlow
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 11:19 AM, Owen Densmore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1 - The probability for each path is calculated by looking at the possible choices at each point in the path. If you see a 3 at a node, for example, the probability assigned to the next move is 1/3. The total