On 01/04/2017 10:15 AM, Eric Charles wrote:
> Sure... the situation would be improved, and we would call it a win, if we
> could send Putin to the principles office... Part of my point was exactly
> that it seems unlikely a public accusation by Trump would do anything towards
> getting Putin to
pplied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Trump, truth, and politics: Why do we still think Trump is
acting with respect to the truth?
Is it a lose if your kid goes to the principal’s office for abusing his
classmates, or goes to jail for a night for drunken bad behavior?
Sure... the sit
Group
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Trump, truth, and politics: Why do we still think Trump is
acting with respect to the truth?
Is it a lose if your kid goes to the principal’s office for abusing his
classmates, or goes to jail for a night for drunken bad behavior?
Sure... the situation would
oup <friam@redfish.com>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Trump, truth, and politics: Why do we still think Trump is
acting with respect to the truth?
Is it a lose if your kid goes to the principal’s office for abusing his
classmates, or goes to jail for a night for drunken bad behavior?
Sure... the
Is it a lose if your kid goes to the principal’s office for abusing his
classmates, or goes to jail for a night for drunken bad behavior?
Sure... the situation would be improved, and we would call it a win, if we
could send Putin to the principles office... Part of my point was exactly
that it
“Even if the intelligence community had iron clad proof, that everyone could
understand and believe beyond a reasonable doubt (which they don't), it would
only heighten questions about the legitimacy of Trump's win. At this point,
that wouldn't be a win for Trump, or the country.”
For some
On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 9:39 AM, Prof David West
wrote:
> Exactly why does anyone believe anything the "intelligence" community
> asserts to be the "truth?"
>
Ars Technica at least, believes the white house hacking report was a fail:
White House fails to make case that
Exactly why does anyone believe anything the "intelligence" community
asserts to be the "truth?"
Two concrete reasons I doubt their veracity at the moment: 1) I have met
several members of Cozy Bear (when I was in Moscow the week before the
election) who readily admit the DNC hack and
Eric writes:
“Are we really going to get four years of the media trying to treat everything
Trumps says as if it is a factual claim he deeply believes?”
It is relevant if his supporters believe his actions come from core values that
are in line with theirs. Is his drama `hyperbole truth’
CNN's home page is taken to clustering stories. In their big cover story at
the moment, The main headline is that Trump mocks intelligence agencies
over the claims regarding Russian hacking. "Mocks" is a not-egregious
interpretations of thing things Trump has said, so that seems like
10 matches
Mail list logo