I clearly don't have a strong enough mathematical background to comprehend
Category Theory. Hewitt's comments do make sense to me, and reinforce the
notion that "ownership" of the data (storage) associated with a message is
transferred between a sending actor and a receiving actor (both
persistent
Roger Critchlow wrote:
> OMG, John is Joan's cousin, unless there are two mathematical
> physicists named John Baez, or someone's been spiking wikipedia.
>
> -- re
both seem about equally likely.
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listser
OMG, John is Joan's cousin, unless there are two mathematical physicists
named John Baez, or someone's been spiking wikipedia.
-- rec --
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 8:41 PM, Douglas Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Ok, now you're really screwing with my mind. Joan C. (Chandos) Baez (
> http://
Ok, now you're really screwing with my mind. Joan C. (Chandos) Baez (
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joan_Baez) writing a paper on Physics,
Topology, Logic and Computation?
I think not. Bad boy, Carl.
--Doug
--
Doug Roberts, RTI International
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
505-455-7333 - Of
Of possible interest to Category Theory buffs:
John Baez and Mike Stay have a new paper entitled:
Physics, Topology, Logic and Computation: A Rosetta Stone
at: http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/rosetta.pdf
In the subsequent discussion at the N-Category Cafe
at:
http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/catego
