You wait until you get to the future to see if your
hypothesis was correct. If it wasn't, you go back and change it. It
can be an iterative process before you get a positive result.
Every time I try that I get *really* confused. Even my lab notes
seem to get all jumbled up and self-contr
You wait until you get to the future to see if your hypothesis was correct.
If it wasn't, you go back and change it. It can be an iterative process
before you get a positive result.
--Doug
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Roger Critchlow wrote:
> So how do you test a hypothesis that the futur
So how do you test a hypothesis that the future is interfering with the
present?
-- rec --
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Douglas Roberts wrote:
> Fairly far out there. Here's one I stumbled across yesterday that is way
> far out there:
>
> The Collider, the Particle and a Theory About Fate
=
Fairly far out there. Here's one I stumbled across yesterday that is way
far out there:
The Collider, the Particle and a Theory About Fate
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/13/science/space/13lhc.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Roger Critchlow wrote:
> So yesterday I'm rea
So yesterday I'm reading about solar energy and thinking -- blah, blah, blah
-- of all the known solutions.
Today Slashdot gives me a blurb about synthetic black holes, which I follow
to new scientist and on to http://arxiv.org/abs/0910.2159v1
The abstract:
Traditionally, a black hole is a reg
